Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Consulate General DuesseldorfU.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf
VS
Gouvernement du Québec – CarrièresGouvernement du Québec – Carrières
U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf

U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf

Willi-Becker Allee 10, Düsseldorf, 40227, DE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://de.usembassy.gov/
760/1000Fair

The U.S. Consulate General Düsseldorf is responsible for Germany's most populous state of North Rhine-Westphalia. Our post encompasses political and economic affairs and public diplomacy initiatives. There are no regular visa or consular services available at the U.S. ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:90
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

875, Grande-Allée Est, Québec, G1R 5R8, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Travailler dans la fonction publique du Québec, c'est plus qu'une carrière! Réparti(e)s dans une vingtaine de ministères et une soixantaine d'organismes à travers le Québec, tous les gestes posés par les employé(e)s de la fonction publique façonnent l’avenir de la socié...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:36,414
Subsidiaries:45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf

U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf

U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf company and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf or Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf or Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Consulate General Duesseldorf and Gouvernement du Québec – Carrières, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1