Tunneldrb vs Rakuten - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

DRB

Rakuten

DRB

3245 Pickle Rd, Akron, Ohio, US, 44312

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://drb.com/

755/1000Fair

With over 40 years as the leading car wash technology provider, DRB® empowers operators to run and grow great businesses through fast, reliable, and engaging solutions. Our advanced point-of-sale systems, marketing automation, data-driven tools, and real-time tunnel per...

NAICS:5112

NAICS Definition:Software Publishers

Employees:607

Subsidiaries:7

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Rakuten

Rakuten Crimson House, Setagaya-ku, 158-0094, JP

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://global.rakuten.com/corp/

761/1000Fair

Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and...

NAICS:5112

NAICS Definition:Software Publishers

Employees:10,943

Subsidiaries:9

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

DRB

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Rakuten

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DRB in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Rakuten has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DRB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DRB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rakuten (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rakuten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

DRB

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Rakuten

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack

RAK1777977150

FAQ

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between DRB company and Rakuten company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between DRB and Rakuten, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between DRB and Rakuten, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DRB or Rakuten ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DRB or Rakuten ?

Between DRB and Rakuten, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between DRB and Rakuten, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES