Comparison Overview
TUI
TUI
Karl-Wiechert Allee 23, Hannover, 30625, DE
Last Update: 08/09/2026
We’re adventure seekers. Smile givers. Impact makers. We believe in the power of travel. It broadens horizons for our customers, and for our people too. New places to live, new roles to explore, new communities to join. It’s yours for the taking. We’re TUI, a leading...
MGM Resorts International
840 Grier Drive, Las Vegas, 89119, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
The resorts and casinos of MGM Resorts International™ are some of the most famous in the world. Our 28 destinations are renowned for their winning combination of quality entertainment, luxurious facilities, and exceptional customer service. We are actively expanding o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
TUI
MGM Resorts International
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TUI in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
MGM Resorts International has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - TUI (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TUI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MGM Resorts International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MGM Resorts International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
TUI
MGM Resorts International
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.