Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Tsunami Tsolutions » ATLTSU1770921536

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ATLTSU1770921536)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-108
Company Score Before Incident747 / 1000
Company Score After Incident639 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERATLTSU1770921536
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED1.2 terabytes (Atlas Air), Unspecified...
INCIDENT DATE31/01/2026
STATUSUnder investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Tsunami Tsolutions's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Tsunami Tsolutions Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Tsunami Tsolutions breach identified under incident ID ATLTSU1770921536.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Tsunami Tsolutions's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tsunami-tsolutions-llc., the number of followers: 3289, the industry type: Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing and the number of employees: 140 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 747 and after the incident was 639 with a difference of -108 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Tsunami Tsolutions and their customers.

Atlas Air recently reported "Everest Ransomware Gang Claims Breach of Atlas Air and Tsunami Tsolutions in Suspected Aerospace Supply Chain Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

The Everest ransomware cartel, a Russia-linked cybercrime group active since July 2021, has claimed responsibility for breaching two key players in the American aerospace industry: cargo airline Atlas Air and aerospace supplier Tsunami Tsolutions.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 1.2 terabytes (Atlas Air), Unspecified (Tsunami Tsolutions).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Atlas Air denied system penetration; Tsunami Tsolutions has not responded.

The case underscores how Under investigation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating coordinated supply chain campaign targeting sensitive technical and operational data and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential single attack vector compromising both companies. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating similarities in exposed data point to a potential single attack vector and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attackers accessed sensitive technical and operational data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 1.2 terabytes of data stolen, including maintenance documents, repair reports and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating boeing-related confidential data, parts catalogues compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 1.2 terabytes of data stolen; data exfiltration confirmed and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attackers posted breach details on a dark web forum. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack claimed by Everest ransomware cartel and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attackers shared screenshots of purported stolen files on dark web. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating supply chain attack compromising multiple aerospace entities. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defacement (60%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (70%)

Sources & References