Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Tsuda USA Corporation » TSUTSU1774657901

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TSUTSU1774657901)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-135
Company Score Before Incident747 / 1000
Company Score After Incident612 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTSUTSU1774657901
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal information, financial information
INCIDENT DATE14/01/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Tsuda USA Corporation's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Tsuda USA Corporation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Tsuda USA Corporation breach identified under incident ID TSUTSU1774657901.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Tsuda USA Corporation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tsuda-usa-corporation, the number of followers: 775, the industry type: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing and the number of employees: 103 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 747 and after the incident was 612 with a difference of -135 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Tsuda USA Corporation and their customers.

On 25 March 2026, TSU One Holdings LLC (Texas State Utilities Inc.) disclosed Data Breach, Ransomware issues under the banner "TSU One Holdings Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information".

TSU One Holdings LLC, a Fort Worth, Texas-based utility services and contracting company, recently disclosed a data breach affecting thousands of individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal information, financial information, with nearly 2,886 (Texas residents confirmed) records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through U.S. Mail notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering U.S. Mail notifications to affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware group claimed responsibility for exfiltrating data and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access timeline not publicly confirmed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating financial information (account and payment card details) exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, Social Security numbers, financial information compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltrated from Texas State Utilities Inc.. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware group claimed responsibility on dark web and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 2,886 Texas residents confirmed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating incident type listed as Ransomware and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware group claimed responsibility on dark web and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exact timeline of unauthorized access not publicly confirmed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Data Destruction (40%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Hide Artifacts (50%)

Sources & References