Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TSCLMT1790173503)

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploited vulnerabilities in company websites to access databases and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched vulnerability in its website that exposed a database. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating employed automated tools to scan for security weaknesses. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating access databases, extracting personal information including...device passcodes. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating stealing sensitive customer data...names, contact details, device passcodes and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited vulnerabilities in company websites to access databases. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating masking his location with digital obfuscation techniques. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating attempting to extort payments in exchange for silence and Financial Theft (T1657) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating demanded ransom payments to prevent the data’s public release. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating masking his location with digital obfuscation techniques and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating anonymous email accounts. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.