Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FERTRY1780367031)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of hampr's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts hampr Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the hampr breach identified under incident ID FERTRY1780367031.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of hampr's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/try-hampr, the number of followers: 2504, the industry type: Consumer Services and the number of employees: 27 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 771 and after the incident was 664 with a difference of -107 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on hampr and their customers.
On 31 May 2024, Hampr disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Hacker Leaks 360,000 Records from Australian Catering Firm Hampr".
A hacker known as *2019* has released over 360,000 records allegedly stolen from Hampr, an Australian corporate catering company, on a popular hacking forum.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 360,000 records, with nearly 360,000 records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party breach via its ticketing platform, Ferve and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating supply chain such as true, third-party breach via Ferve. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating account details, payment details compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating customer IDs, names, mobile numbers, dietary preferences and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating billing information, workspace data compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 360,000 records released on hacking forum and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data posted on popular hacking forum. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating data made freely available on hacking forum and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating 360,000 records compromised, no response from Hampr. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- hampr Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/try-hampr/incident/FERTRY1780367031
- hampr CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/try-hampr
- hampr Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/fertry1780367031-ferve-hampr-breach-may-2026/
- hampr CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/try-hampr/history
- hampr CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.cyberdaily.au/security/13679-exclusive-aussie-workplace-catering-firm-hampr-suffers-alleged-360k-record-data-breach
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf