Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tru by HiltonTru by Hilton
VS
JW MarriottJW Marriott
Tru by Hilton

Tru by Hilton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia, 22102, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trubyhilton.com
778/1000Fair

Tru by Hilton is a game-changing midscale hotel brand providing a simplified and spirited approach that is grounded in value for business and leisure travelers. Different from any other hotel product on the market today, Tru by Hilton was developed using a mix of market...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:1,136
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
JW Marriott

JW Marriott

N/A

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://www.jwmarriott.com
862/1000Very Good

No loud pretense. No excess formalities. Just understated elegance you’ll feel the moment you walk into one of over 80 worldwide destinations. JW Marriott is part of Marriott International’s luxury portfolio and consists of beautiful properties in gateway cities and di...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:15,863
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tru by Hilton

Tru by Hilton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JW Marriott

JW Marriott

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tru by Hilton in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JW Marriott in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tru by Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tru by Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JW Marriott (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JW Marriott cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tru by Hilton

Tru by Hilton

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
JW Marriott

JW Marriott

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tru by Hilton company and JW Marriott company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tru by Hilton and JW Marriott, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tru by Hilton and JW Marriott, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tru by Hilton or JW Marriott ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tru by Hilton or JW Marriott ?
Between Tru by Hilton and JW Marriott, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tru by Hilton and JW Marriott, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3