JW Marriott
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
jw_marriott
Website:
Employees number:
15,169
Number of followers:
270,347
NAICS:
7211
Industry Type:
Homepage:
jwmarriott.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
JW _2903603
Scan Status:
In-progress
JW Marriott Company CyberSecurity Posture
jwmarriott.com
No loud pretense. No excess formalities. Just understated elegance you’ll feel the moment you walk into one of over 80 worldwide destinations. JW Marriott is part of Marriott International’s luxury portfolio and consists of beautiful properties in gateway cities and distinctive resort locations in 28 countries around the world. These elegant hotels cater to today’s sophisticated, self-assured travelers, offering them the quiet luxury they seek in a warmly authentic, relaxed atmosphere lacking in pretense. JW Marriott properties artfully provide highly crafted, anticipatory experiences that are reflective of their locale so that their guests have the time to focus on what is most important to them.
JW Marriott A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
JW Marriott Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 849
JW Marriott
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
JW Marriott Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
JW Marriott
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
JW Marriott Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
6
Attack Types
2
Marriott International, Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported on October 30, 2019, that Marriott International, Inc. experienced a data breach involving 1,552 California residents. The breach was caused by unauthorized access to information about certain associates through a vendor's network, compromising personal data including names, addresses, and Social Security numbers. Marriott has terminated its relationship with the vendor and is offering credit monitoring services.
Marriott International
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Hotel giant Marriott International suffered a data breach after an unknown threat actor breached one of its properties and stole 20GB of files. The hackers stole 20GB worth of documents containing non-sensitive internal business files and some credit card information. Marriott hired a third-party security firm to investigate the incident and notified the affected individuals.
Marriott International, Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General disclosed a major **data breach** at **Marriott International, Inc.** on **November 30, 2018**, stemming from an unauthorized access to the **Starwood guest reservation database**. The breach, which began **on or before September 10, 2018**, exposed the records of approximately **500 million guests**, with **327 million individuals** having sensitive personal data compromised. This included **names, mailing addresses, email addresses, and encrypted payment card numbers**, though the encryption status of the latter was not confirmed to be broken. The incident originated from a vulnerability in Starwood’s systems, which Marriott had acquired in 2016, highlighting a failure in post-merger cybersecurity integration. The breach posed severe risks of **identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage**, given the scale and sensitivity of the exposed data. Regulatory investigations followed, with Marriott facing significant legal and financial repercussions, including fines under **GDPR** and other data protection laws. The incident underscored critical gaps in **third-party risk management** and the protection of customer data in large-scale corporate acquisitions.
Marriott International Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Marriott International Inc. faced a major data breach involving its Starwood-branded hotels, exposing the personal information of up to **383 million guests**. The breach, which led to consolidated litigation, included sensitive customer data such as names, addresses, passport numbers, and payment details. The city of Chicago filed claims against Marriott, but the case was dismissed with prejudice after a settlement was reached. The incident underscores the severe consequences of large-scale data leaks, particularly in the hospitality sector, where trust and data security are critical. The breach not only risked financial fraud and identity theft for affected guests but also damaged Marriott’s reputation, leading to legal repercussions and regulatory scrutiny. The scale of the exposure—affecting hundreds of millions—highlights the systemic vulnerabilities in handling customer data across global operations.
Marriott International
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Hotel giant Marriott International suffered a data breach after an unknown person gained access to information about certain Marriott associates by accessing the network of an outside vendor formerly used by Marriott. Marriott immediately confirmed that the vendor was taking appropriate to steps to investigate the incident. The vendor reported that it was working with a forensic firm and had notified law enforcement. This incident did not impact the security of Marriott’s internal HR systems or platforms. The information in the document received by this vendor that contains your information includes your name, address, and Social Security number. Marriott hired a third-party security firm to investigate the incident and notified the affected individuals.
Marriott Hotels
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: A third attack against the hotel chain, Marriott, has resulted in yet another data breach. This is the second time this year that data has been stolen from the hotel firm. An employee at the BWI Airport Marriott in Baltimore stated that about 20GB of data, including credit card numbers and PII of visitors and employees, had been stolen. The hacking organisation requested a ransom from Marriott to keep the data they had obtained from being released, but the money was not paid.
JW Marriott Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for JW Marriott
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JW Marriott in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JW Marriott in 2025.
Incident Types JW Marriott vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JW Marriott in 2025.
Incident History — JW Marriott (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JW Marriott cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
JW Marriott Company Subsidiaries
No loud pretense. No excess formalities. Just understated elegance you’ll feel the moment you walk into one of over 80 worldwide destinations. JW Marriott is part of Marriott International’s luxury portfolio and consists of beautiful properties in gateway cities and distinctive resort locations in 28 countries around the world. These elegant hotels cater to today’s sophisticated, self-assured travelers, offering them the quiet luxury they seek in a warmly authentic, relaxed atmosphere lacking in pretense. JW Marriott properties artfully provide highly crafted, anticipatory experiences that are reflective of their locale so that their guests have the time to focus on what is most important to them.
Loading...
JW Marriott Similar Companies
MGM Resorts International
The resorts and casinos of MGM Resorts International™ are some of the most famous in the world. Our 28 destinations are renowned for their winning combination of quality entertainment, luxurious facilities, and exceptional customer service. We are actively expanding our presence globally, with pot
Shangri-La Group
Headquartered in Hong Kong SAR, the Shangri-La Group has grown from a single hotel business to a diverse and integrated global portfolio comprising quality real estate and investment properties, wellness and lifestyle facilities. Today, the Group owns, operates and manages 100+ hotels under our fami
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts opened its first hotel in 1961, and since that time has been dedicated to perfecting the travel experience through continual innovation and the highest standards of hospitality. Currently operating more than 120 hotels and resorts, and more than 50 residential propert
Mandarin Oriental
Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group is the award-winning owner and operator of some of the world’s most luxurious hotels, resorts and residences. Having grown from its Asian roots into a global brand, the Group now operates 43 hotels, 12 residences and 23 exclusive homes in 26 countries and territories, w
IHG Hotels & Resorts
IHG Hotels & Resorts [LON:IHG, NYSE:IHG (ADRs)] is a global hospitality company, with a purpose to provide True Hospitality for Good. With a family of 19 hotel brands and IHG One Rewards, one of the world's largest hotel loyalty programmes, IHG has over 6,300 open hotels in more than 100 countries,
Best Western Hotels & Resorts
Best Western Hotels & Resorts headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, is a privately held hotel company within the BWH℠ Hotels global enterprise. With 19 brands and approximately 4,300 hotels in over 100 countries and territories worldwide*, BWH Hotels suits the needs of developers and guests in every ma
Hilton (NYSE: HLT) is a leading global hospitality company with a portfolio of 24 world-class brands comprising more than 8,400 properties and over 1.25 million rooms, in 140 countries and territories. Dedicated to fulfilling its founding vision to fill the earth with the light and warmth of hospita
SJM Resorts
SJM Resorts, S.A. ("SJM") is one of the six concessionaires in Macau, authorised by the Government of the Macau Special Administrative Region to operate casinos and gaming areas. SJM is also the only casino gaming concessionaire with its roots in Macau. SJM owns and operates the Grand Lisboa Palace
With over 500 properties worldwide, Marriott Hotels has reimagined hospitality to exceed the expectations of business, group, and leisure travelers. Marriott Hotels, Marriott’s flagship brand of quality-tier, full-service hotels and resorts, provides consistent, dependable and genuinely caring
.png)
JW Marriott CyberSecurity News
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
ManageEngine Brings Its Cybersecurity Seminar, Shield NxG 2025, to the United Arab Emirates
ManageEngine, a division of Zoho Corporation and a leading provider of enterprise IT management solutions, today announced the UAE debut of...
October 04, 2025 07:00 AM
Safaricom Business Hosts Exclusive Cybersecurity Breakfast
Safaricom Business on Friday hosted an exclusive cybersecurity breakfast session, bringing together over 50 senior IT and security...
September 10, 2025 07:00 AM
Marriott Focuses on AI and Cybersecurity in Technology Overhaul
Article - Marriott Focuses on AI and Cybersecurity in Technology Overhaul - Marriott International is implementing a digital transformation...
September 05, 2025 07:00 AM
Marriott checks out AI agents amid technology transformation
The multinational hospitality giant is building a model-agnostic chassis featuring an agentic layer.
August 21, 2025 07:00 AM
CISO India Connect 2025 – Mumbai
Date: August 21, 2025. Location: JW Marriott, Juhu, Mumbai. CISO Connect India 2025 is a premier cybersecurity leadership summit bringing together top CISOs...
May 17, 2025 08:34 AM
Indonesia Prepares New Cybersecurity Law, Sanctions for Negligent Platforms
The Indonesian government is preparing a revision of the Cybersecurity and Resilience (RUU KKS) that will include penalties for platforms that fail to...
May 12, 2025 07:00 AM
Data Privacy Breaches: A Wake-Up Call for Hotel Operators
High-profile incidents like the Marriott International breach and the recent Otelier cyberattack reveal the devastating risks for hoteliers and their guests.
May 01, 2025 07:00 AM
Junaid Saifi appointed IT manager at JW Marriott Kolkata
JW Marriott Kolkata: One of the youngest and most dynamic multi-property IT managers in the Marriott portfolio, Saifi will lead the...
April 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Junaid Saifi appointed IT Manager at JW Marriott Kolkata
JW Marriott Kolkata has announced the appointment of Junaid Saifi as the new Information Technology (IT) Manager, furthering the hotel's...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
JW Marriott CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of JW Marriott
The official website of JW Marriott is http://www.jwmarriott.com.
JW Marriott’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, JW Marriott’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 802, reflecting their Good security posture.
How many security badges does JW Marriott’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, JW Marriott currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does JW Marriott have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, JW Marriott is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does JW Marriott have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, JW Marriott does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does JW Marriott comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, JW Marriott is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does JW Marriott have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, JW Marriott does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does JW Marriott comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, JW Marriott is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does JW Marriott have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,JW Marriott is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of JW Marriott
JW Marriott operates primarily in the Hospitality industry.
Number of Employees at JW Marriott
JW Marriott employs approximately 15,169 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by JW Marriott
JW Marriott presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
JW Marriott’s LinkedIn Followers
JW Marriott’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 270,347 followers.
NAICS Classification of JW Marriott
JW Marriott is classified under the NAICS code 7211, which corresponds to Traveler Accommodation.
JW Marriott’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, JW Marriott does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
JW Marriott’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, JW Marriott maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/jw_marriott.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving JW Marriott
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that JW Marriott has experienced 6 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
JW Marriott has an estimated 13,638 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at JW Marriott ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak and Breach.
How does JW Marriott detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with hired a third-party security firm to investigate the incident, and communication strategy with notified the affected individuals, and third party assistance with forensic firm, and law enforcement notified with yes, and communication strategy with affected individuals notified, and remediation measures with terminated relationship with the vendor, remediation measures with offering credit monitoring services, and communication strategy with public disclosure via california office of the attorney general..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Data Breach at Marriott Hotel Chain
Description: A third attack against the hotel chain, Marriott, has resulted in yet another data breach. This is the second time this year that data has been stolen from the hotel firm. An employee at the BWI Airport Marriott in Baltimore stated that about 20GB of data, including credit card numbers and PII of visitors and employees, had been stolen. The hacking organisation requested a ransom from Marriott to keep the data they had obtained from being released, but the money was not paid.
Type: Data Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: Marriott International Data Breach
Description: Hotel giant Marriott International suffered a data breach after an unknown threat actor breached one of its properties and stole 20GB of files.
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: Unknown
Title: Marriott International Data Breach
Description: Hotel giant Marriott International suffered a data breach after an unknown person gained access to information about certain Marriott associates by accessing the network of an outside vendor formerly used by Marriott.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Access to vendor network
Threat Actor: Unknown
Title: Marriott International Data Breach
Description: Unauthorized access to information about certain associates through a vendor's network, compromising personal data including names, addresses, and Social Security numbers.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2019-10-30
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Title: Marriott International (Starwood) Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach at Marriott International, Inc. involving the Starwood guest reservation database. The breach occurred on or before September 10, 2018, and could potentially affect approximately 500 million guests, with 327 million guests' information including names, addresses, email addresses, and encrypted payment card numbers.
Date Detected: 2018-09-10
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2018-11-30
Type: Data Breach
Title: Marriott International Data Breach Settlement with the City of Chicago
Description: Marriott International Inc. settled the city of Chicago’s claims in consolidated litigation over a data breach that compromised the personal information of as many as 383 million guests at its Starwood-branded hotels. Judge John P. Bailey of the US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia issued an order dismissing the city’s claims with prejudice on Thursday, one day after the city filed a stipulation of dismissal with the court.
Type: Data Breach
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Vendor network.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR1318722
Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Pii
Incident : Data Breach MAR13023722
Data Compromised: Internal business files, Credit card information
Incident : Data Breach MAR81730423
Data Compromised: Name, Address, Social security number
Incident : Data Breach MAR327072925
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers
Incident : Data Breach MAR019090625
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Email addresses, Encrypted payment card numbers
Systems Affected: Starwood guest reservation database
Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to scale of breach and sensitive data exposure)
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of PII)
Payment Information Risk: Moderate (payment card numbers were encrypted)
Incident : Data Breach MAR0802208101125
Data Compromised: Personal information of up to 383 million guests
Legal Liabilities: Consolidated litigation with the city of Chicago (settled)
Identity Theft Risk: ['Personal information of guests']
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Credit Card Numbers, Pii, , Internal Business Files, Credit Card Information, , Personally Identifiable Information, , Names, Addresses, Social Security Numbers, , Personal Identifiable Information (Pii), Payment Card Information (Encrypted), , Personal Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR1318722
Entity Name: Marriott
Entity Type: Hotel Chain
Industry: Hospitality
Location: Baltimore
Incident : Data Breach MAR13023722
Entity Name: Marriott International
Entity Type: Hotel
Industry: Hospitality
Incident : Data Breach MAR81730423
Entity Name: Marriott International
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Hospitality
Incident : Data Breach MAR327072925
Entity Name: Marriott International, Inc.
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Hospitality
Customers Affected: 1552
Incident : Data Breach MAR019090625
Entity Name: Marriott International, Inc.
Entity Type: Hospitality Corporation
Industry: Hospitality
Location: Global (Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, USA)
Size: Large (Fortune 500 company)
Customers Affected: Approximately 500 million (327 million with detailed records exposed)
Incident : Data Breach MAR0802208101125
Entity Name: Marriott International Inc.
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Hospitality
Location: Global (Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, USA)
Customers Affected: Up to 383 million guests (Starwood-branded hotels)
Incident : Data Breach MAR0802208101125
Entity Name: City of Chicago
Entity Type: Government Entity
Industry: Public Administration
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR13023722
Third Party Assistance: Hired a third-party security firm to investigate the incident
Communication Strategy: Notified the affected individuals
Incident : Data Breach MAR81730423
Third Party Assistance: Forensic firm
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes
Communication Strategy: Affected individuals notified
Incident : Data Breach MAR327072925
Remediation Measures: Terminated relationship with the vendorOffering credit monitoring services
Incident : Data Breach MAR019090625
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via California Office of the Attorney General
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Hired a third-party security firm to investigate the incident, Forensic firm.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR1318722
Type of Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Pii
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach MAR13023722
Type of Data Compromised: Internal business files, Credit card information
Data Exfiltration: 20GB of files
Incident : Data Breach MAR81730423
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: NameAddressSocial Security number
Incident : Data Breach MAR327072925
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Social security numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 1552
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach MAR019090625
Type of Data Compromised: Personal identifiable information (pii), Payment card information (encrypted)
Number of Records Exposed: Up to 500 million (327 million with sensitive details)
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Data Encryption: Payment card numbers were encrypted; other data (e.g., names, addresses) likely unencrypted
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesAddressesEmail addresses
Incident : Data Breach MAR0802208101125
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Number of Records Exposed: Up to 383 million
Sensitivity of Data: High (personal information of guests)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (guest personal information)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Terminated relationship with the vendor, Offering credit monitoring services, .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR019090625
Regulations Violated: Potential violations of GDPR (for EU guests), California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) considerations,
Regulatory Notifications: Reported to California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach MAR0802208101125
Legal Actions: Litigation with the city of Chicago (settled),
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Litigation with the city of Chicago (settled), .
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR327072925
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2019-10-30
Incident : Data Breach MAR019090625
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2018-11-30
Incident : Data Breach MAR0802208101125
Source: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia (Judge John P. Bailey)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2019-10-30, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2018-11-30, and Source: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia (Judge John P. Bailey).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR81730423
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Incident : Data Breach MAR0802208101125
Investigation Status: Settled (claims dismissed with prejudice)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notified the affected individuals, Affected individuals notified and Public disclosure via California Office of the Attorney General.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MAR81730423
Entry Point: Vendor network
Incident : Data Breach MAR019090625
High Value Targets: Starwood Guest Reservation Database,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Starwood Guest Reservation Database,
Post-Incident Analysis
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Hired a third-party security firm to investigate the incident, Forensic firm.
Additional Questions
General Information
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was True.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Unknown and Unknown.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2018-09-10.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2018-11-30.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Credit Card Numbers, PII, , Internal business files, Credit card information, , Name, Address, Social Security number, , Names, Addresses, Social Security numbers, , Names, Addresses, Email addresses, Encrypted payment card numbers, , Personal information of up to 383 million guests and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Starwood guest reservation database.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Hired a third-party security firm to investigate the incident, Forensic firm.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Email addresses, Addresses, Credit Card Numbers, PII, Name, Social Security numbers, Encrypted payment card numbers, Social Security number, Personal information of up to 383 million guests, Internal business files, Address, Credit card information and Names.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.2B.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was True.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Litigation with the city of Chicago (settled), .
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are California Office of the Attorney General and US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia (Judge John P. Bailey).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Vendor network.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=jw_marriott' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
