Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TRE1791801486)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Kollekt's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Kollekt Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kollekt breach identified under incident ID TRE1791801486.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kollekt's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/trendmatch-aps, the number of followers: 178, the industry type: Technology, Information and Internet and the number of employees: 9 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 766 and after the incident was 648 with a difference of -118 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kollekt and their customers.
Pays ApS recently reported "Major CPR Data Breach in Denmark Linked to Weak Password at Small IT Firm", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
A hacker accessed Denmark’s Central Person Register (CPR), exposing approximately 8.8 million CPR numbers after compromising a small IT company, Pays ApS.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Denmark’s Central Person Register (CPR), and exposing 8.8 million CPR numbers, with nearly 8.8 million records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public advisories to citizens about phishing risks.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Weak security controls in third-party organizations with access to sensitive national infrastructure pose significant risks. Importance of strong password policies and multi-factor authentication, and recommending next steps like Enforce strong password policies, implement multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts, and conduct regular security audits for third-party vendors with access to critical systems, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Danish authorities urged citizens to remain cautious of unsolicited messages containing personal details.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating use of the notoriously weak password 123456 on an administrative account and Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (T1078.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating weak password (123456) on administrative account. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating weak password (123456) on administrative account and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating leaked password from a former employee. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating access lasted 21 days and 17 hours via administrative account. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposing approximately 8.8 million CPR numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating automated tools to extract data over 21 days. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating access to the national database (CPR system). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating abused authorized access to the CPR system. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Kollekt Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/trendmatch-aps/incident/TRE1791801486
- Kollekt CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/trendmatch-aps
- Kollekt Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/tre1791801486-pays-aps-breach-september-2026/
- Kollekt CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/trendmatch-aps/history
- Kollekt CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cybernews.com/security/denmark-cpr-data-breach-weak-password/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf