Comparison Overview
Transnet Port Terminals

Transnet Port Terminals
202 Anton Lembede Street, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, ZA, 4001
Last Update: 12/03/2026
Transnet Port Terminals (TPT) is South Africa’s leading terminal operator responsible for loading and offloading cargo aboard vessels calling the seven South African ports. Boasting a staff compliment of over 9000 across 16 cargo terminals, TPT’s operations target four...

Hapag-Lloyd AG
Ballindamm 25, Hamburg, 20095, DE
Last Update: 11/09/2026
With a fleet of 302 modern container ships and a total transport capacity of 2.5 million TEU, Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world’s leading liner shipping companies. In the Liner Shipping segment, the Company has 15,200 employees and 400 offices in 140 countries. Hapag-Lloy...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Transnet Port Terminals







Hapag-Lloyd AG






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Transnet Port Terminals in 2026.
Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
Hapag-Lloyd AG has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Transnet Port Terminals (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Transnet Port Terminals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Hapag-Lloyd AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hapag-Lloyd AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Transnet Port Terminals

Hapag-Lloyd AG
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.