Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Joint Stock Company Transneft is a state-controlled pipeline transport company headquartered in Moscow, Russia. It is the largest oil pipeline company in the world. Transneft is operating over 70,000 kilometres (43,000 mi) of trunk pipelines and transports about 80% of oil and 30% of oil products produced in Russia.

Transneft A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Transneft

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

transneft-jsc

Employees number:

159

Number of followers:

611

NAICS:

486

Industry Type:

Pipeline Transportation

Homepage:

https://www.transneft.ru

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

TRA_2285384

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreTransneft Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transneft-jsc.jpeg
Transneft Pipeline Transportation
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreTransneft Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transneft-jsc.jpeg
Transneft Pipeline Transportation
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Transneft Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
TransneftCyber Attack10087/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack that could bring to a war

Description: A targeted cyberattack was executed by the hacker group Cavalry Werewolf against a Russian government-owned entity in July 2025. The attack began with a phishing campaign using password-protected archives disguised as legitimate documents, deploying a previously unknown backdoor (BackDoor.ShellNET.1) based on open-source Reverse-Shell-CS code. This allowed remote command execution, persistence via Windows registry edits, and deployment of additional malware, including the Trojan.FileSpyNET.5 infostealer designed to exfiltrate documents, spreadsheets, images, and system data to an external server.The attackers leveraged Windows BITSAdmin to download further payloads, established SOCKS5 tunnels for covert communication, and used Telegram bots to control compromised systems. Trojanized versions of WinRAR, 7-Zip, and Visual Studio Code were also distributed to launch secondary infections. The group gathered confidential government data, internal network configurations, and user credentials via Windows commands (`whoami`, `ipconfig /all`, `net user`), indicating a focused effort on espionage and long-term infiltration.Cavalry Werewolf, linked to prior campaigns targeting Russian state agencies and industrial firms (energy, mining, manufacturing), employed custom tools like FoalShell and StallionRAT, suggesting advanced capabilities with potential ties to other threat actors (Silent Lynx, YoroTrooper). The breach risks compromised national security data, operational disruptions, and further escalation if the group expands targeting to critical infrastructure or civilian systems.

Russian government-owned organisation (unnamed)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 8
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack that could bring to a war

Description: A targeted cyberattack was executed by the hacker group Cavalry Werewolf against a Russian government-owned entity in July 2025. The attack began with a phishing campaign using password-protected archives disguised as legitimate documents, deploying a previously unknown backdoor (BackDoor.ShellNET.1) based on open-source Reverse-Shell-CS code. This allowed remote command execution, persistence via Windows registry edits, and deployment of additional malware, including the Trojan.FileSpyNET.5 infostealer designed to exfiltrate documents, spreadsheets, images, and system data to an external server.The attackers leveraged Windows BITSAdmin to download further payloads, established SOCKS5 tunnels for covert communication, and used Telegram bots to control compromised systems. Trojanized versions of WinRAR, 7-Zip, and Visual Studio Code were also distributed to launch secondary infections. The group gathered confidential government data, internal network configurations, and user credentials via Windows commands (`whoami`, `ipconfig /all`, `net user`), indicating a focused effort on espionage and long-term infiltration.Cavalry Werewolf, linked to prior campaigns targeting Russian state agencies and industrial firms (energy, mining, manufacturing), employed custom tools like FoalShell and StallionRAT, suggesting advanced capabilities with potential ties to other threat actors (Silent Lynx, YoroTrooper). The breach risks compromised national security data, operational disruptions, and further escalation if the group expands targeting to critical infrastructure or civilian systems.

Ailogo

Transneft Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Transneft

Incidents vs Pipeline Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transneft in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transneft in 2026.

Incident Types Transneft vs Pipeline Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transneft in 2026.

Incident History — Transneft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transneft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Transneft Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Joint Stock Company Transneft is a state-controlled pipeline transport company headquartered in Moscow, Russia. It is the largest oil pipeline company in the world. Transneft is operating over 70,000 kilometres (43,000 mi) of trunk pipelines and transports about 80% of oil and 30% of oil products produced in Russia.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Transneft Similar Companies

South Bow

South Bow safely operates 4,900 kilometres (3,045 miles) of crude oil pipeline infrastructure, connecting Alberta crude oil supplies to U.S. refining markets in Illinois, Oklahoma, and the U.S. Gulf Coast through our unrivalled market position. We take pride in what we do – providing safe and reli

ITP Interpipe

Since 1992 ITP Interpipe, based in Paris and Houston, has specialized in the design, provision and fabrication of highly insulated pipelines. ITP Interpipe's products include highly insulated pipe-in-pipes for subsea flowlines, insulated subsea cryogenic pipelines and insulated onshore pipelines.

Gaon Group

Gaon Group is a leading provider of integrated sustainable infrastructure solutions. The company acts as an operational Holding Company that focuses on developing products and services through its subsidiaries as well as management of complex infrastructure projects worldwide. Included in the holdi

newsone

Transneft CyberSecurity News

July 28, 2025 07:00 AM
Aeroflot Grounded After Devastating Cyberattack: Hacker Group Claims System ‘Destroyed’

A cyberattack by Silent Crow cripples Aeroflot's systems, grounding flights across Russia. Experts warn of growing digital warfare threats...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Transneft CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Transneft

The official website of Transneft is https://www.transneft.ru.

Transneft’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Transneft’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 738, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Transneft’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Transneft currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Transneft been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Transneft has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Transneft have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Transneft is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Transneft have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Transneft does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Transneft comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Transneft is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Transneft have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Transneft does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Transneft comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Transneft is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Transneft have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Transneft is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Transneft

Transneft operates primarily in the Pipeline Transportation industry.

Number of Employees at Transneft

Transneft employs approximately 159 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Transneft

Transneft presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Transneft’s LinkedIn Followers

Transneft’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 611 followers.

NAICS Classification of Transneft

Transneft is classified under the NAICS code 486, which corresponds to Pipeline Transportation.

Transneft’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Transneft does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Transneft’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Transneft maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/transneft-jsc.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Transneft

As of January 23, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Transneft has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Transneft has an estimated 4 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Transneft ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

How does Transneft detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with doctor web (investigation)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack

Title: Targeted Attack by Cavalry Werewolf on Russian Government-Owned Organization

Description: Cybersecurity researchers at Doctor Web discovered a targeted attack against a Russian government-owned organization by the hacker group Cavalry Werewolf. The operation began in July 2025 after the organization noticed spam emails sent from its own corporate address. The attack involved a phishing campaign using password-protected archives posing as legitimate documents, deploying a new backdoor (BackDoor.ShellNET.1) based on open-source Reverse-Shell-CS code. Attackers used Windows’ BITSAdmin to download additional payloads, including Trojan.FileSpyNET.5 (infostealer) and BackDoor.Tunnel.41 (SOCKS5 tunnel for covert communication). The group relied on open-source frameworks, custom backdoors (C#, C++, Golang), and Telegram bots for command-and-control. Trojanized versions of WinRAR, 7-Zip, and Visual Studio Code were also used to deploy secondary malware. The goal was to collect confidential information and internal network configurations.

Date Detected: 2025-07

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07

Type: Targeted Attack

Attack Vector: Phishing EmailsPassword-Protected Malicious ArchivesReverse Shell (BackDoor.ShellNET.1)BITSAdmin for Payload DeliveryTrojanized Software (WinRAR, 7-Zip, VS Code)Telegram Bot C2

Vulnerability Exploited: Human Error (Phishing)Abuse of Legitimate Tools (BITSAdmin)Trojanized Software Supply Chain

Threat Actor: Cavalry Werewolf

Motivation: EspionageData TheftIntelligence Gathering

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phishing Emails (Password-Protected Archives).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Data Compromised: Documents, Spreadsheets, Text files, Images, System/network configurations, User information

Operational Impact: Unauthorized Remote Command ExecutionData ExfiltrationPersistence via Registry/Scheduled TasksCovert Communication Channels

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential Reputation Damage (Government Entity Targeted)

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Corporate Documents, System/Network Configurations, User Credentials, Local Files (Images, Text, Spreadsheets) and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Entity Type: Government Organization

Industry: Public Sector

Location: Russia

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Doctor Web (Investigation).

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Doctor Web (Investigation), .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Type of Data Compromised: Corporate documents, System/network configurations, User credentials, Local files (images, text, spreadsheets)

Sensitivity of Data: High (Government/Industrial Espionage)

File Types Exposed: DocumentsSpreadsheetsText FilesImagesConfiguration Files

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Data Exfiltration: True

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Lessons Learned: Avoid downloading software from third-party/unverified sources., Verify all email attachments, especially password-protected archives., Monitor for abuse of legitimate tools (e.g., BITSAdmin, Telegram bots)., Scan files via VirusTotal/antivirus before execution., Cavalry Werewolf reuses and tweaks malware tools across campaigns, indicating persistent evolution.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Recommendations: Implement stricter email security controls (e.g., sandboxing, attachment scanning)., Restrict execution of scripts/tools like BITSAdmin via least-privilege policies., Monitor for unusual outbound traffic (e.g., SOCKS5 tunnels, Telegram C2)., Educate employees on phishing risks, especially spear-phishing impersonating officials., Audit systems for persistence mechanisms (registry edits, scheduled tasks)., Use official software sources and verify file integrity.Implement stricter email security controls (e.g., sandboxing, attachment scanning)., Restrict execution of scripts/tools like BITSAdmin via least-privilege policies., Monitor for unusual outbound traffic (e.g., SOCKS5 tunnels, Telegram C2)., Educate employees on phishing risks, especially spear-phishing impersonating officials., Audit systems for persistence mechanisms (registry edits, scheduled tasks)., Use official software sources and verify file integrity.Implement stricter email security controls (e.g., sandboxing, attachment scanning)., Restrict execution of scripts/tools like BITSAdmin via least-privilege policies., Monitor for unusual outbound traffic (e.g., SOCKS5 tunnels, Telegram C2)., Educate employees on phishing risks, especially spear-phishing impersonating officials., Audit systems for persistence mechanisms (registry edits, scheduled tasks)., Use official software sources and verify file integrity.Implement stricter email security controls (e.g., sandboxing, attachment scanning)., Restrict execution of scripts/tools like BITSAdmin via least-privilege policies., Monitor for unusual outbound traffic (e.g., SOCKS5 tunnels, Telegram C2)., Educate employees on phishing risks, especially spear-phishing impersonating officials., Audit systems for persistence mechanisms (registry edits, scheduled tasks)., Use official software sources and verify file integrity.Implement stricter email security controls (e.g., sandboxing, attachment scanning)., Restrict execution of scripts/tools like BITSAdmin via least-privilege policies., Monitor for unusual outbound traffic (e.g., SOCKS5 tunnels, Telegram C2)., Educate employees on phishing risks, especially spear-phishing impersonating officials., Audit systems for persistence mechanisms (registry edits, scheduled tasks)., Use official software sources and verify file integrity.Implement stricter email security controls (e.g., sandboxing, attachment scanning)., Restrict execution of scripts/tools like BITSAdmin via least-privilege policies., Monitor for unusual outbound traffic (e.g., SOCKS5 tunnels, Telegram C2)., Educate employees on phishing risks, especially spear-phishing impersonating officials., Audit systems for persistence mechanisms (registry edits, scheduled tasks)., Use official software sources and verify file integrity.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Avoid downloading software from third-party/unverified sources.,Verify all email attachments, especially password-protected archives.,Monitor for abuse of legitimate tools (e.g., BITSAdmin, Telegram bots).,Scan files via VirusTotal/antivirus before execution.,Cavalry Werewolf reuses and tweaks malware tools across campaigns, indicating persistent evolution.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Source: Doctor Web Technical Report

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Source: Hackread.com (Translated Article)

URL: https://www.hackread.com/cavalry-werewolf-russian-government-hack/

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Doctor Web Technical Report, and Source: Hackread.com (Translated Article)Url: https://www.hackread.com/cavalry-werewolf-russian-government-hack/.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Doctor Web Analysis)

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Entry Point: Phishing Emails (Password-Protected Archives)

Reconnaissance Period: ['May 2025 – August 2025 (Observed Campaign Window)']

Backdoors Established: ['BackDoor.ShellNET.1', 'BackDoor.Tunnel.41', 'FoalShell (Past Operations)', 'StallionRAT (Past Operations)']

High Value Targets: Russian State Agencies, Energy Sector, Mining Sector, Manufacturing Sector,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Russian State Agencies, Energy Sector, Mining Sector, Manufacturing Sector,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Targeted Attack TRA3192431110625

Root Causes: Successful Phishing Leading To Malware Execution., Abuse Of Legitimate Utilities (Bitsadmin, Telegram Bots)., Lack Of Detection For Trojanized Software (Winrar, 7-Zip, Vs Code)., Persistence Via Windows Registry/Scheduled Tasks.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Doctor Web (Investigation), .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Cavalry Werewolf.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-07.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-07.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Documents, Spreadsheets, Text Files, Images, System/Network Configurations, User Information and .

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was doctor web (investigation), .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Spreadsheets, Documents, Images, System/Network Configurations, Text Files and User Information.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Cavalry Werewolf reuses and tweaks malware tools across campaigns, indicating persistent evolution.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Educate employees on phishing risks, especially spear-phishing impersonating officials., Use official software sources and verify file integrity., Monitor for unusual outbound traffic (e.g., SOCKS5 tunnels, Telegram C2)., Audit systems for persistence mechanisms (registry edits, scheduled tasks)., Implement stricter email security controls (e.g., sandboxing, attachment scanning). and Restrict execution of scripts/tools like BITSAdmin via least-privilege policies..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Hackread.com (Translated Article) and Doctor Web Technical Report.

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.hackread.com/cavalry-werewolf-russian-government-hack/ .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Doctor Web Analysis).

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Phishing Emails (Password-Protected Archives).

What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was May 2025 – August 2025 (Observed Campaign Window).

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=transneft-jsc' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge