Comparison Overview

Transneft

VS

Gaon Group

Transneft

Moscow International Business Center, Moscow, RU
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.transneft.ru

Joint Stock Company Transneft is a state-controlled pipeline transport company headquartered in Moscow, Russia. It is the largest oil pipeline company in the world. Transneft is operating over 70,000 kilometres (43,000 mi) of trunk pipelines and transports about 80% of oil and 30% of oil products produced in Russia.

NAICS: 486
NAICS Definition: Pipeline Transportation
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Gaon Group

8 Ariel Sharon Ave., Or Yehuda, undefined, undefined, IL
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gaon.com

Gaon Group is a leading provider of integrated sustainable infrastructure solutions. The company acts as an operational Holding Company that focuses on developing products and services through its subsidiaries as well as management of complex infrastructure projects worldwide. Included in the holding company's portfolio, are leading manufacturing companies for quality metal and plastic pipes, valves of all sizes and for all purposes, high end water meters, world class irrigation products, long distance control systems innovative technologies for desalination and water purification and more. Our customers and partners benefits from working with Israel's largest operator of conveyance infrastructures. We offer a unique combination of experience, technology, engineering, management, financing construction and maintenance all under a single roof.

NAICS: 486
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transneft-jsc.jpeg
Transneft
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/b.gaon-holdings-group.jpeg
Gaon Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Transneft
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gaon Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pipeline Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transneft in 2026.

Incidents vs Pipeline Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gaon Group in 2026.

Incident History — Transneft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transneft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gaon Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gaon Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transneft-jsc.jpeg
Transneft
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Password-Protected Malicious Archives, Reverse Shell (BackDoor.ShellNET.1), BITSAdmin for Payload Delivery, Trojanized Software (WinRAR, 7-Zip, VS Code), Telegram Bot C2
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Intelligence Gathering
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/b.gaon-holdings-group.jpeg
Gaon Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gaon Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transneft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transneft company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gaon Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gaon Group company and Transneft company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gaon Group company nor Transneft company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gaon Group company nor Transneft company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Transneft company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gaon Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transneft company nor Gaon Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Transneft nor Gaon Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gaon Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Transneft company.

Transneft company employs more people globally than Gaon Group company, reflecting its scale as a Pipeline Transportation.

Neither Transneft nor Gaon Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Transneft nor Gaon Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Transneft nor Gaon Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Transneft nor Gaon Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Transneft nor Gaon Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Transneft nor Gaon Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References