Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Tower Administrative Services » TOW1782506884

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TOW1782506884)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-65
Company Score Before Incident769 / 1000
Company Score After Incident704 / 1000
Company LinkView Tower Administrative Services Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERTOW1782506884
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, addresses,...
INCIDENT DATE02/02/2026
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Tower Administrative Services's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Tower Administrative Services Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Tower Administrative Services breach identified under incident ID TOW1782506884.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Tower Administrative Services's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tower-administrative-services, the number of followers: 8, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 13 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 769 and after the incident was 704 with a difference of -65 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Tower Administrative Services and their customers.

On 23 June 2026, Tower Administrative Services Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Tower Administrative Services Data Breach".

Tower Administrative Services Inc., a Pennsylvania-based insurance administration firm, confirmed a data breach involving unauthorized access to its corporate network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Corporate network, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, addresses, financial account details (debit/credit card numbers).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Breach notifications sent to affected individuals; public notice posted on company website; disclosures to attorneys general of Nebraska, Texas, and Vermont.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection services offered; dedicated assistance line established (8 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its corporate network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating corporate network access suggests possible external entry point. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to SSNs, financial account details implies credential compromise and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive data accessed suggests possible credential harvesting. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, addresses, financial account details accessed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating insurance administration firm likely stores structured PII/financial data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 25,820 individuals; exfiltration implied and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating corporate network access suggests possible external data transfer. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but breach implies potential risk and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access may have allowed data tampering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References