Comparison Overview

Toscana Aeroporti

VS

Etihad

Toscana Aeroporti

Via del Termine, 11, Firenze, 50141, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Toscana Aeroporti S.p.A is the management company of Florence and Pisa airports. Toscana Aeroporti was established on 1 June 2015 from the merger of AdF - Aeroporto di Firenze S.p.A. (management company of A. Vespucci airport in Florence) and SAT - Società Aeroporto Toscano S.p.A. (management company of the G. Galilei airport in Pisa). The Toscana Aeroporti group is made up of the main company Toscana Aeroporti Spa and of the subsidiaries Jet Fuel Co, S.r.l. (hereinafter Jet Fuel), Parking Peretola S.r.l., Toscana Aeroporti Engineering S.r.l., Toscana Aeroporti Handling S.r.l. The merger between the two companies is the fundamental step for the creation of a single Tuscan airport system, in line with the provisions of the National Airport Plan approved by the Italian Ministry of Transport. Thanks to the synergies between the two airports and to the complementarity of the system's offer as a whole, it will be possible to increase the number of destinations reachable by the two airports and the airlines thanks to the adaptation of the respective infrastructures. In the long term, Tuscany Airports expects to achieve more than 130 destinations around the world, 45 airlines and 160 daily frequencies companies in 2029. The two airports will maintain their specificity in the specialization of air traffic: Vespucci airport will continue to develop business and leisure traffic through full service carriers, connecting the main European hubs; Galilei airport will favor tourist traffic managed by low-cost carriers, cargo flights and will also focus on the development of intercontinental flights. Thanks to the integration of these two realities, Tuscany will be able to count on one of the most important airport systems in the country, able to constitute a driving force for economic development of the territory at the height of one of the most known and loved regions in the world.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 283
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Etihad

P.O. Box 35566, New Airport Road, Khalifa City A, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, AE, 35566
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Marhaba! Welcome to Etihad Airways. We are proud to be the national airline of the UAE, flying to 100+ destinations via Abu Dhabi. At Etihad, we don't stop at the border of what's possible, we go beyond it. Proudly inspired by our Emirati identity, we are dedicated to delivering extraordinary travel experiences, helping our guests realise their ambitions. Our journey started in 2003. Since then, we have proudly helped millions of guests travel the globe. We are honoured to have had over 12 million valued members join our Etihad Guest loyalty programme. Diversity is key in driving us forward. At 12,000+ employees representing 140+ nationalities, our team comes together to deliver exceptional experiences at every stage of the journey. If you share our spirit of ambition and would like to reach new heights, visit https://careers.etihad.com/

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,927
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toscana-aeroporti.jpeg
Toscana Aeroporti
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etihadairways.jpeg
Etihad
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toscana Aeroporti
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Etihad
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toscana Aeroporti in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Etihad has 122.22% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Toscana Aeroporti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toscana Aeroporti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Etihad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Etihad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toscana-aeroporti.jpeg
Toscana Aeroporti
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/etihadairways.jpeg
Etihad
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Etihad company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toscana Aeroporti company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Etihad company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Toscana Aeroporti company has not reported any.

In the current year, Etihad company has reported more cyber incidents than Toscana Aeroporti company.

Neither Etihad company nor Toscana Aeroporti company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Etihad company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Toscana Aeroporti company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Etihad company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Toscana Aeroporti company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti company nor Etihad company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti nor Etihad holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Etihad company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Toscana Aeroporti company.

Etihad company employs more people globally than Toscana Aeroporti company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti nor Etihad holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti nor Etihad holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti nor Etihad holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti nor Etihad holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti nor Etihad holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toscana Aeroporti nor Etihad holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H