Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Toronto Police ServiceToronto Police Service
VS
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Toronto Police Service

Toronto Police Service

40 College St, Toronto, M5G 2J3, CA

Last Update: 04/05/2026

View Profile
703/1000Moderate

The Toronto Police Service is the fourth largest municipal police service in North America with over 5500 officers and 2200 civilian support staff. The Service enjoys a well-earned reputation as a world leader in policing and is committed to excellence, innovation, qua...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:2,805
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

J. Edgar Hoover Building, Washington, 20535-0001, US

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.fbijobs.gov
100/1000Critical

This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier ...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:10,425
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
13
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Toronto Police Service

Toronto Police Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

Toronto Police Service has 43.18% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has 1126.42% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Toronto Police Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toronto Police Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Toronto Police Service

Toronto Police Service

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOR1777898508
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FBIHUN1782843828
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FBIOFF1778905426
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FBI1779517614

FAQ

Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Toronto Police Service company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Toronto Police Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Toronto Police Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Toronto Police Service or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Toronto Police Service or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Between Toronto Police Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Toronto Police Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8