Comparison Overview
Tommy Hilfiger
Tommy Hilfiger
Danzigerkade 165, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1013
Last Update: 12/09/2026
TOMMY HILFIGER is one of the world’s leading designer lifestyle brands creating a platform that inspires the modern American spirit, while committing to wasting nothing and welcoming all. Founded in 1985, Tommy Hilfiger delivers premium styling, quality and value to c...
MANGO
Mercaders 9-11, Palau Solità i Plegamans, 08184, ES
Last Update: 09/09/2026
Mango, one of the leading international fashion groups, is a global company with design and creativity at the heart of its business model and a strategy based on constant innovation, the pursuit of sustainability and a complete ecosystem of channels and partners. With ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Tommy Hilfiger
MANGO
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tommy Hilfiger in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
MANGO has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Tommy Hilfiger (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tommy Hilfiger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MANGO (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MANGO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Tommy Hilfiger
MANGO
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.