Comparison Overview
Miral
Miral
Opp. Warner Bros. World - Yas Island, Abu Dhabi, AE, PO BOX 147774
Last Update: 28/02/2026
Abu Dhabi’s driving force behind immersive destinations and memorable experiences within the leisure, entertainment and tourism industry. From record-breaking theme parks to captivating waterfront locations and world class hotels, we take ambitious and diverse leisure,...
Electronic Arts (EA)
209 Redwood Shores Pkwy, Redwood City, CA, US, 94065
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Electronic Arts creates next-level entertainment experiences that inspire players and fans around the world. Here, everyone is part of the story. Part of a community that connects across the globe. A team where creativity thrives, new perspectives are invited, and ideas...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Miral
Electronic Arts (EA)
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Miral in 2026.
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Electronic Arts (EA) in 2026.
Incident History - Miral (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Miral cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Electronic Arts (EA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Electronic Arts (EA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Miral
Electronic Arts (EA)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.