What is the official website of The MIT Leadership Center ?

The official website of The MIT Leadership Center is http://leadership.mit.edu/.

What is The MIT Leadership Center's cybersecurity risk score?

The MIT Leadership Center has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 757 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has The MIT Leadership Center experienced?

According to Rankiteo, The MIT Leadership Center currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has The MIT Leadership Center been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, The MIT Leadership Center has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does The MIT Leadership Center have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The MIT Leadership Center is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does The MIT Leadership Center have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The MIT Leadership Center does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does The MIT Leadership Center comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, The MIT Leadership Center is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does The MIT Leadership Center have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The MIT Leadership Center does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does The MIT Leadership Center comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, The MIT Leadership Center is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does The MIT Leadership Center have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,The MIT Leadership Center is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does The MIT Leadership Center operate in ?

The MIT Leadership Center operates primarily in the Education Management industry.

How many employees does The MIT Leadership Center have ?

The MIT Leadership Center employs approximately 0 people worldwide.

Does The MIT Leadership Center own any subsidiaries ?

The MIT Leadership Center presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does The MIT Leadership Center have ?

The MIT Leadership Center's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 5,697 followers.

Does The MIT Leadership Center have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, The MIT Leadership Center does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does The MIT Leadership Center have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, The MIT Leadership Center maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-mit-leadership-center.

How many cybersecurity incidents has The MIT Leadership Center experienced ?

As of September 14, 2026, Rankiteo reports that The MIT Leadership Center has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does The MIT Leadership Center have ?

The MIT Leadership Center has an estimated 4,715 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MLC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

757

/1000

Fair

782

/1000

Fair

The MIT Leadership Center Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mit.edu

Add Your Compliance Badge

Developing innovative leaders who solve the world's most challenging problems.

MLC

The MIT Leadership Center CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

MLC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MLC

Incidents vs Education Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The MIT Leadership Center in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The MIT Leadership Center in 2026.

Incident Types MLC vs Education Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The MIT Leadership Center in 2026.

Incident History - MLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

The MIT Leadership Center Subsidiaries

MLC

Education Management

Website: http://leadership.mit.edu/

Company Size: 0

Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyHigher Education

MIT Alumni AssociationHigher Education

MIT Office of Resource DevelopmentFundraising

MIT Sloan School of ManagementHigher Education

MIT Sloan Sustainability InitiativeHigher Education

MIT Initiative on the Digital EconomyResearch

MIT Leaders for Global Operations (LGO)Higher Education

Loading…

The MIT Leadership Center Similar Companies

Secretaria de Educação do Estado de Pernambuco

pe.gov.br

For 52 years, the Department of Education of Pernambuco was linked to the health department of the State. The disconnect between the two bodies and the consequent acquisition of autonomy of the SE came through Law 466, on 22 April 1949, during the administration of then Governor Alexandre José Barbosa Lima Sobrinho. The regulation of the Secretary of State for Education and Culture was approved by Decree No. 75, June 8, 1949. At that time, the first secretary, Silvio de Lira Rabelo, had assumed the folder for a month and a half. After the regulation, the Department had changed the nomenclature four times: - Decree 3197 of August 13, 1974 - approves the rules of the Department of Education and Culture; - Decree 15,717 of April 27, 1992 - approves the rules of the Department of Education, Culture and Sports; - Decree 18,594 of July 17, 1995 - approves the rules of the Department of Education and Sports; - Decree 21,682 of September 1, 1999 - approves the rules of the Department of Education to the present day.

Loading…

NEWS

The MIT Leadership Center CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

September 03, 2025 07:00 AM

2 MIT professors offer a case study to consider for AI adoption: GM versus Toyota in the 1980s

GM's decline and Toyota's rise offers a case study in AI adoption. Two MIT Sloan academics offer advice on how to avoid repeating GM's...

Read Article

August 22, 2025 07:00 AM

See the BBJ's Executive Education Directory 2025

Here is the Boston Business Journal's 2025 Executive Education Guide, our annual guide to the region's colleges and universities providing...

Read Article

August 12, 2025 07:00 AM

Leaders on campus explores careers in cybersecurity for students

Bengaluru: The Times of India's Leaders on Campus is back, launching its first session of the academic year with a deep dive into one of the...

Read Article

July 11, 2025 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity’s global alarm system is breaking down

The global early warning system that alerts security teams to dangerous software flaws is showing critical gaps in coverage.

Read Article

May 20, 2025 07:00 AM

Women Know Cyber: 150 Fascinating Females Fighting Cybercrime

Role models for students, parents, educators, and the cybersecurity community Sponsored by Secureworks.

Read Article

May 11, 2025 07:00 AM

Oxford Saïd Launches Cyber Crisis Elective As High Street Retailers Reel From Attacks

Oxford Saïd Business School has introduced a new MBA elective focused on cyber resilience — the first of its kind at the University of Oxford...

Read Article

April 24, 2025 07:00 AM

MIT Sloan Reunion 2025: What to Expect

From Thursday, May 29, to Sunday, June 1, thousands of alumni and their guests will converge on Cambridge to reconnect with classmates, learn new lessons from...

Read Article

April 24, 2025 07:00 AM

MIT Renames Legatum Center To Kuo Sharper Center

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has renamed its Legatum Center for Development and Entrepreneurship to the MIT Kuo Sharper Center for...

Read Article

April 16, 2025 07:00 AM

IBM X-Force 2025 Threat Intelligence Index

We share insights about the changing threat landscape and how organizations can transform cyber defense into cyber resilience.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-90603

SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Anil-matcha Open-Generative-AI up to 1.0.11/2.0.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /api/upload-binary of the component S3 Upload. Such manipulation of the argument x-proxy-target-url leads to unrestricted upload. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is f013270957f75e439eaf97eb2a93decb32a4543e. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue.

Published

Date2026-09-13

Updated

Date2026-09-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)

cvss2

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 7.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.4

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-90602

SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Anil-matcha Open-Generative-AI up to 1.0.11/2.0.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function renderHistory of the file ImageStudio.js of the component Studio Components. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

Published

Date2026-09-13

Updated

Date2026-09-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)

cvss2

Base Score: 4.0

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

cvss3

Base Score: 3.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 5.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.1

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-90601

SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in getzep graphiti up to 0.30.2. Affected is an unknown function of the file server/graph_service/main.py of the component REST API. The manipulation results in improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

Published

Date2026-09-13

Updated

Date2026-09-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)

cvss2

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 7.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.4

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-90600

SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Sales and Inventory System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /pages/inv_edit1.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published

Date2026-09-13

Updated

Date2026-09-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)

cvss2

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-15892

SUMMARY

The mcumgr SMP settings-management group handlers settings_mgmt_read(), settings_mgmt_write(), and settings_mgmt_delete() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/grp/settings_mgmt/src/settings_mgmt.c allocate a key_name buffer (and, for read, a data buffer) via k_malloc() when CONFIG_MCUMGR_GRP_SETTINGS_BUFFER_TYPE_HEAP is enabled, relying on the end: label to k_free() them. When CONFIG_MCUMGR_GRP_SETTINGS_ACCESS_HOOK is also enabled and the application access hook rejects a request by returning status MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC, the handler executed return ret_rc; directly, bypassing end: and leaking the heap allocation on every rejected request. The settings handlers are reachable over the unauthenticated SMP transport (Bluetooth LE, UART, or UDP, depending on product configuration). The access hook is the mechanism applications use to deny unauthorized settings access, and MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC is a common rejection style, so an attacker who can send settings read/write/delete commands that the hook rejects triggers a heap leak on each attempt. Because the leaked memory is never reclaimed until reboot, a sustained stream of rejected requests monotonically exhausts the kernel heap until k_malloc() fails, denying mcumgr service and impacting any other heap consumer on the device — a denial of service. The impact is availability-only; there is no memory corruption or information disclosure. Only configurations that select the heap buffer type, enable the access hook, and register a hook that returns MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC are affected (the default stack buffer type cannot leak).

Published

Date2026-09-13

Updated

Date2026-09-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

The MIT Leadership Center Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

MLC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

The MIT Leadership Center CyberSecurity News & History

MLC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for MLC

Incidents vs Education Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types MLC vs Education Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - MLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The MIT Leadership Center Subsidiaries

MLC

The MIT Leadership Center Similar Companies

Secretaria de Educação do Estado de Pernambuco

The MIT Leadership Center CyberSecurity News

2 MIT professors offer a case study to consider for AI adoption: GM versus Toyota in the 1980s

See the BBJ's Executive Education Directory 2025

Leaders on campus explores careers in cybersecurity for students

Cybersecurity’s global alarm system is breaking down

Women Know Cyber: 150 Fascinating Females Fighting Cybercrime

Oxford Saïd Launches Cyber Crisis Elective As High Street Retailers Reel From Attacks

MIT Sloan Reunion 2025: What to Expect

MIT Renames Legatum Center To Kuo Sharper Center

IBM X-Force 2025 Threat Intelligence Index

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

The MIT Leadership Center CyberSecurity News & History

MLC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for MLC

Incidents vs Education Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types MLC vs Education Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - MLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The MIT Leadership Center Subsidiaries

MLC

The MIT Leadership Center Similar Companies

Secretaria de Educação do Estado de Pernambuco

The MIT Leadership Center CyberSecurity News

2 MIT professors offer a case study to consider for AI adoption: GM versus Toyota in the 1980s

See the BBJ's Executive Education Directory 2025

Leaders on campus explores careers in cybersecurity for students

Cybersecurity’s global alarm system is breaking down

Women Know Cyber: 150 Fascinating Females Fighting Cybercrime

Oxford Saïd Launches Cyber Crisis Elective As High Street Retailers Reel From Attacks

MIT Sloan Reunion 2025: What to Expect

MIT Renames Legatum Center To Kuo Sharper Center

IBM X-Force 2025 Threat Intelligence Index

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo