Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Linux FoundationThe Linux Foundation
VS
AtlassianAtlassian
The Linux Foundation

The Linux Foundation

1 Letterman Drive, San Francisco, CA, US, 94129

Last Update: 05/08/2026

View Profile
732/1000Moderate

The Linux Foundation is the organization of choice for the world's top developers and companies to build ecosystems that accelerate open technology development and commercial adoption. Together with the worldwide open source community, it is solving the hardest technolo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,049
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Atlassian

Atlassian

Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 10/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://atlassian.com/
751/1000Fair

Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practice...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,931
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Linux Foundation

The Linux Foundation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlassian

Atlassian

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

The Linux Foundation has 560.38% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Atlassian has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - The Linux Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Linux Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Linux Foundation

The Linux Foundation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
THE1779985482
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
THE1779301477
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DEBTHECAN1782498459
Atlassian

Atlassian

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1786359965
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1776868681
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1774866325

FAQ

Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Linux Foundation company and Atlassian company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Linux Foundation and Atlassian, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Linux Foundation and Atlassian, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Linux Foundation or Atlassian ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Linux Foundation or Atlassian ?
Between The Linux Foundation and Atlassian, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Linux Foundation and Atlassian, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-77648
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.7
CVE-2026-77647
SUMMARY

SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-77113
SUMMARY

Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77646
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77645
SUMMARY

A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA