What is the official website of The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand ?

The official website of The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand is http://www.leadershipchallenge.com/home.aspx.

What is The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand's cybersecurity risk score?

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 772 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand experienced?

According to Rankiteo, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand operate in ?

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand operates primarily in the Professional Training and Coaching industry.

How many employees does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have ?

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand own any subsidiaries ?

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have ?

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 4,953 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand ?

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand is classified under the NAICS code 6114, which corresponds to Business Schools and Computer and Management Training.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-leadership-challenge.

How many cybersecurity incidents has The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand experienced ?

As of June 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand have ?

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand has an estimated 7,286 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

LCWB

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

772

/1000

Fair

797

/1000

Fair

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

leadershipchallenge.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Take the Leadership Challenge® and Make Extraordinary Things Happen The Leadership Challenge® model is based on years of research by Jim Kouzes and Barry Posner whose books have sold over two million copies worldwide. Their vision of leadership has created pathways for everyone from students to CEOs to begin their personal journeys to leadership excellence. The Leadership Challenge® development programs and e-learning opportunities are all designed with a single goal in mind - to liberate the leader within in everyone. Liberate the Leader Within The Leadership Challenge® is a global campaign to liberate the leader in everyone. Any individual, any team, any organization can make strides when ordinary people enable those around them to

LCWB A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

LCWB

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

The Leadership Chal...

Breach

9/2025

JOH243312409102...

Loading…

A.I.

LCWB Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for LCWB

Incidents vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand in 2026.

Incident Types LCWB vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand in 2026.

Incident History - LCWB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand Subsidiaries

LCWB

Professional Training and Coaching

Website: http://www.leadershipchallenge.com/home.aspx

Company Size: 5,001-10,000 employees

WileyBook and Periodical Publishing

AtyponSoftware Development

Everything DiSC: A Wiley BrandProfessional Training and Coaching

The Five Behaviors®: A Wiley BrandProfessional Training and Coaching

Wiley Analytical ScienceBook and Periodical Publishing

Loading…

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand Similar Companies

AFPA

afpa.fr

L'AFPA, PREMIER ORGANISME DE FORMATION PROFESSIONNELLE DES ADULTES Avec plus de 140 000 personnes formées chaque année dans plus de 200 implantations partout en France, l’Afpa, devenue Agence nationale pour la formation professionnelle des adultes en janvier 2017, est depuis plus de 65 ans, le premier organisme de formation des actifs, salariés et demandeurs d’emploi. Sa dimension nationale en fait l'un des principaux acteurs de la politique de l'emploi et de la formation professionnelle. UNE FORMATION UTILE ET PERFORMANTE, AU SERVICE DES ENTREPRISES L’Afpa propose une large gamme de formations qualifiantes et certifiantes, immédiatement utiles sur le marché de l’emploi, dans une logique de formation tout au long de la vie : insertion, reconversion, professionnalisation. Elle forme prioritairement aux métiers qui recrutent, considérant que la formation doit être un investissement pour les entreprises, et une arme majeure de lutte contre le chômage. Six mois après une formation Afpa, 60% des stagiaires ont retrouvé un emploi. UNE OFFRE DE FORMATION RENOUVELEE, EN LIGNE AVEC LE CPF Parce qu’aujourd’hui la formation devient plus que jamais la responsabilité de tous, l’Afpa déploie une nouvelle offre plus souple, modulaire et compatible avec le Compte Personnel de Formation (CPF). 200 ingénieurs de formation assurent une veille permanente pour répondre au double impératif de l’efficience économique et de l’utilité sociale et être toujours plus proche des besoins des entreprises et de l'évolution des métiers.

My own company (I am self-employed)

anglais-pratique.fr

I created "My own company" in order to be able to invoice my clients, but I am now fully retired. I spend a fair share of my leisure time enhancing my "hobby" website (https://anglais-pratique.fr/), which is primarily intended for French speakers who wish to improve their English. I want to leave this group ("My own company..."), but can't find how, probably because I created it!!! So let it be :-)

Loading…

NEWS

The Leadership Challenge®: A Wiley Brand CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 24, 2025 07:00 AM

A Survey on Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): Enabling Technologies, Security and Explainability Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions

Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) paradigm refers to the process of collection, transmission and analysis of healthcare data using...

Read Article

October 16, 2024 07:00 AM

How to define cyber-risk appetite as a security leader

It's a truth universally acknowledged that virtually every company with internet connectivity assumes some degree of cyber-risk -- the only...

Read Article

January 02, 2024 08:00 AM

Cybersecurity in 2024: Ten Top Issues to Consider

As we enter the New Year, Wiley has looked back at the top cyber issues for 2023 and what they mean for 2024. Last year, we saw the rollout...

Read Article

April 05, 2022 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity Challenges in Blockchain Technology: A Scoping Review

This scoping review paper was aimed at exploring the current literature's scope and categorizing various types of cybersecurity challenges in BCT.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…