Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The cURL projectThe cURL project
VS
FacebookFacebook
The cURL project

The cURL project

N/A

Last Update: 25/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://curl.se/
785/1000Fair

An open source project creating a command line tool and library for transferring data with URLs. Portable, fast, feature rich and stable.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Facebook

Facebook

N/A

Last Update: 21/10/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.meta.com
634/1000Poor

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:27,058
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The cURL project

The cURL project

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Facebook

Facebook

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

The cURL project has 92.31% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Facebook has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - The cURL project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The cURL project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Facebook (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Facebook cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The cURL project

The cURL project

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
THE1782398225
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
THE1782318614
Facebook

Facebook

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFLFACEQU1792614607
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FAC4793447091625
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAC215421222

FAQ

Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The cURL project company and Facebook company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The cURL project and Facebook, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The cURL project and Facebook, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The cURL project or Facebook ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The cURL project or Facebook ?
Between The cURL project and Facebook, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The cURL project and Facebook, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9