Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Co-op » HARMARTHEBRI1769526687

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HARMARTHEBRI1769526687)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-154
Company Score Before Incident254 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
Company LinkView Co-op Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERHARMARTHEBRI1769526687
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE31/05/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Co-op's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Co-op Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Co-op breach identified under incident ID HARMARTHEBRI1769526687.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Co-op's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-co-op-group, the number of followers: 237038, the industry type: Retail and the number of employees: 21188 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 254 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of -154 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Co-op and their customers.

British Horseracing Authority (BHA) recently reported "British Horseracing Authority (BHA) Ransomware Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

The British Horseracing Authority (BHA) suffered a ransomware attack in early June 2025, compromising multiple servers within its IT infrastructure.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Multiple servers within IT infrastructure, and exposing True.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like IT staff worked remotely to contain the breach.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating compromising multiple servers within its IT infrastructure and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating perceived security gaps, where weak defenses make breaches easier. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack in early June 2025. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption such as true in ransomware details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating double extortion...stealing sensitive information before locking systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating perceived security gaps, where weak defenses make breaches easier. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group has not been identified, details kept confidential. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)

Sources & References