ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

We are the UK’s national library. We give access to the world’s most comprehensive collection of over 170 million items - a living collection that grows every single day. Dating back 3,000 years, the collection includes Shakespeare’s First Folio, Magna Carta, a rare recording of Florence Nightingale and even Sylvia Pankhurst’s poems written on toilet paper from prison… But the collection also includes this morning’s newspapers, blogs and tweets, as well as a copy of every UK domain website. Our collection helps to open up a world of ideas. It can inspire people to start businesses. Spark new works of art and literature. Make scientific discoveries. Visit bl.uk to start your journey of discovery.

The British Library A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

BL

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

the-british-library

Employees number:

1,306

Number of followers:

94,533

NAICS:

51912

Industry Type:

Libraries

Homepage:

bl.uk

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

THE_2153552

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreBL Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 600 and 649

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-british-library.jpeg
BL Libraries
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreBL Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-british-library.jpeg
BL Libraries
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

BL Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
2
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
British LibraryCyber Attack100510/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The British Library, home to over 170 million items including historically significant documents like the Magna Carta, suffered a **major cyber attack in October 2023** that crippled its digital systems. The attack led to the **leak of staff personal details (addresses, passport scans) on the dark web** after the library refused to pay a £600,000 ransom. Two years later, the disruption persists: **services like ebooks, archives, and online journals remain unavailable**, forcing staff to manually process orders, increasing workloads, and exposing them to abuse from frustrated users. Employees, some of whom had experienced domestic abuse, faced severe consequences, including **relocation due to exposed addresses**, constant fraudulent communications, and financial strain. Over **300 staff went on strike** on the attack’s second anniversary, citing below-inflation pay rises (2.4%), unaddressed pay shortfalls, and the emotional toll of sustained operational chaos. The attack’s long-term impact includes **reputational damage, operational paralysis, and ongoing staff exploitation**, with no full system recovery in sight.

British LibraryRansomware10056/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The British Library fell victim to a **Rhysida ransomware attack** in **2023**, resulting in the theft of approximately **600GB of sensitive data**. The attack was part of a broader campaign where the Rhysida group, operating under a **Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model**, exploited **poisoned Bing ads** mimicking Microsoft Teams download pages to distribute malware. Victims unknowingly downloaded **OysterLoader and Latrodectus**, which deployed ransomware, backdoors, and infostealers. The breach severely disrupted the library’s operations, compromising internal systems, employee records, and potentially **user data**, including research materials and personal information. The attack underscored the group’s sophistication in leveraging **social engineering and trusted platforms** (Microsoft/Bing) to infiltrate high-profile targets. While the full extent of financial or reputational damage remains undisclosed, the incident aligns with Rhysida’s history of targeting **critical infrastructure, education, and government entities**, often demanding ransoms for decryption keys and stolen data recovery.

British LibraryRansomware10010/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The October 2023 ransomware attack on the British Library destroyed the institution’s entire technology infrastructure, affecting access to one of the world’s most significant knowledge collections. This attack highlights the devastating impact of cyber threats on essential services.

British Library
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 10/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The British Library, home to over 170 million items including historically significant documents like the Magna Carta, suffered a **major cyber attack in October 2023** that crippled its digital systems. The attack led to the **leak of staff personal details (addresses, passport scans) on the dark web** after the library refused to pay a £600,000 ransom. Two years later, the disruption persists: **services like ebooks, archives, and online journals remain unavailable**, forcing staff to manually process orders, increasing workloads, and exposing them to abuse from frustrated users. Employees, some of whom had experienced domestic abuse, faced severe consequences, including **relocation due to exposed addresses**, constant fraudulent communications, and financial strain. Over **300 staff went on strike** on the attack’s second anniversary, citing below-inflation pay rises (2.4%), unaddressed pay shortfalls, and the emotional toll of sustained operational chaos. The attack’s long-term impact includes **reputational damage, operational paralysis, and ongoing staff exploitation**, with no full system recovery in sight.

British Library
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The British Library fell victim to a **Rhysida ransomware attack** in **2023**, resulting in the theft of approximately **600GB of sensitive data**. The attack was part of a broader campaign where the Rhysida group, operating under a **Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model**, exploited **poisoned Bing ads** mimicking Microsoft Teams download pages to distribute malware. Victims unknowingly downloaded **OysterLoader and Latrodectus**, which deployed ransomware, backdoors, and infostealers. The breach severely disrupted the library’s operations, compromising internal systems, employee records, and potentially **user data**, including research materials and personal information. The attack underscored the group’s sophistication in leveraging **social engineering and trusted platforms** (Microsoft/Bing) to infiltrate high-profile targets. While the full extent of financial or reputational damage remains undisclosed, the incident aligns with Rhysida’s history of targeting **critical infrastructure, education, and government entities**, often demanding ransoms for decryption keys and stolen data recovery.

British Library
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact:
Seen: 10/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The October 2023 ransomware attack on the British Library destroyed the institution’s entire technology infrastructure, affecting access to one of the world’s most significant knowledge collections. This attack highlights the devastating impact of cyber threats on essential services.

Ailogo

BL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for BL

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The British Library in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The British Library in 2025.

Incident Types BL vs Libraries Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The British Library in 2025.

Incident History — BL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

BL Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

We are the UK’s national library. We give access to the world’s most comprehensive collection of over 170 million items - a living collection that grows every single day. Dating back 3,000 years, the collection includes Shakespeare’s First Folio, Magna Carta, a rare recording of Florence Nightingale and even Sylvia Pankhurst’s poems written on toilet paper from prison… But the collection also includes this morning’s newspapers, blogs and tweets, as well as a copy of every UK domain website. Our collection helps to open up a world of ideas. It can inspire people to start businesses. Spark new works of art and literature. Make scientific discoveries. Visit bl.uk to start your journey of discovery.

Loading...
similarCompanies

BL Similar Companies

Morton Grove Public Library

The Morton Grove Public Library serves the informational, professional, educational and recreational needs of Morton Grove's diverse, multicultural community. Morton Grove Public Library's building of 31,000 square feet houses more than 136,000 items, ranging from current best-sellers to the latest

Frisco Public Library

The Frisco Public Library has been an essential provider of books, information, ideas, and education for all Frisco residents since 1991, with a mission to inspire intellect, curiosity, and imagination. The library supports self-directed education, provides educational assistance, and offers enlight

Patchogue-Medford Library

The mission of the Patchogue-Medford Library is to provide resources and opportunities to empower, educate and entertain the community. The Library is a School District Public Library serving the residents of the Patchogue-Medford School District. The District encompasses the Incorporated Village

Erasmus Boekhandel

International library supplier since 1934 Erasmus supplies a full range of academic publications on all subjects, from all countries and in all languages. They include monographs, standing orders, ‘grey’ literature, print-on-demand titles, CD ROMs, DVDs, e-books and journals. Not only do we suppl

Potsdam Public Library

The Potsdam Public Library is central to the intellectual life of our community. It provides the tools, resources, and techniques for literacy, lifelong learning, recreation, and research. Our library is a leveling influence on the digital divide, providing high-speed internet access, digital litera

Fox River Valley Public Library District

Fox River Valley Public Library District serves 70,000+ residents of East Dundee, West Dundee, Carpentersville, Gilberts, Sleepy Hollow, and parts of Algonquin, Barrington Hills, and Elgin. FRVPLD is the seventh largest out of 340 library districts in Illinois. Our vision is to provide equal opportu

newsone

BL CyberSecurity News

November 16, 2025 10:10 AM
Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill

As the UK Government has recognized, cyber incidents—such as Jaguar Land Rover, Marks and Spencer, Royal Mail and the British Library—are...

November 03, 2025 08:00 AM
Data centres: planning policy, sustainability, and resilience

Data centres are warehouse-like facilities that house the information technology (IT) equipment upon which almost all digital activity...

October 14, 2025 07:00 AM
‘Critical gaps persist’: How to safeguard your organisation in an evolving cybersecurity landscape

The cybersecurity landscape has changed dramatically in the last few years. Organisations now depend heavily on cloud-based systems accessed...

September 25, 2025 07:00 AM
Digital ID cards: a versatile and useful tool or a worrying cybersecurity risk?

As Keir Starmer aims to revive ID card system first proposed by Tony Blair, we look at the arguments for and against.

July 30, 2025 07:00 AM
UK cybersecurity workers are overworked, overwhelmed, and burning out faster than global counterparts — here's why

UK cybersecurity workers are burning out faster than ever due to rising operational pressure, growing risk complexity, and heightened board...

July 22, 2025 07:00 AM
New UK law would ban ransomware payments by publicly funded orgs

Hard-hit Britain aims to remove financial incentives for cybercrime, but experts are split on effectiveness.

July 22, 2025 07:00 AM
UK’s Toughest Cyber Law Yet: Ransom Payments Prohibited

UK to ban public sector and critical infrastructure organisations from paying ransom demands to cybercriminals, aiming to disrupt ransomware...

July 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Charting the Future: Regulatory Milestones and Opportunities in AI, Online Safety, Cybersecurity, and Data Governance in the EU and the UK

This article highlights the key milestones for the next 12 months, focusing on four main areas: online safety, AI, data governance, and cybersecurity and...

July 08, 2025 07:00 AM
Cybersecurity stocks: why now might be the time to buy

Cyberattacks can cost companies millions. Here's how to invest in the firms fighting back.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

BL CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of The British Library

The official website of The British Library is http://www.bl.uk.

The British Library’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, The British Library’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 641, reflecting their Poor security posture.

How many security badges does The British Library’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, The British Library currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does The British Library have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The British Library is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does The British Library have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The British Library does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does The British Library comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, The British Library is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does The British Library have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, The British Library does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does The British Library comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, The British Library is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does The British Library have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,The British Library is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of The British Library

The British Library operates primarily in the Libraries industry.

Number of Employees at The British Library

The British Library employs approximately 1,306 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by The British Library

The British Library presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

The British Library’s LinkedIn Followers

The British Library’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 94,533 followers.

NAICS Classification of The British Library

The British Library is classified under the NAICS code 51912, which corresponds to Libraries and Archives.

The British Library’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, The British Library does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

The British Library’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, The British Library maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-british-library.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving The British Library

As of November 28, 2025, Rankiteo reports that The British Library has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

The British Library has an estimated 1,268 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at The British Library ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Cyber Attack.

How does The British Library detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with robust backup strategies, containment measures with air-gapped storage systems, containment measures with tested disaster recovery procedures, and enhanced monitoring with ncsc early warning service, and and containment measures with refusal to pay £600,000 ransom, containment measures with manual workflows implemented, and remediation measures with partial system restoration (digital forms for orders), remediation measures with ongoing recovery efforts, and recovery measures with gradual service restoration, recovery measures with negotiations with trade unions, and communication strategy with public acknowledgment of impact, communication strategy with union engagements for pay disputes, and third party assistance with expel (security researchers), and communication strategy with public disclosure via the register/techradar..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware

Title: UK Government Bans Ransomware Payments for Public Sector and Critical Infrastructure

Description: The UK government has announced comprehensive measures to tackle ransomware attacks, including a ban on paying ransom demands for public sector organizations and critical national infrastructure operators.

Type: Ransomware

Motivation: Financial

Incident : Cyber Attack

Title: British Library Cyber Attack (October 2023)

Description: A major cyber attack in October 2023 disrupted the British Library's digital systems, leading to the leak of staff personal details on the dark web. The attack caused prolonged operational chaos, manual workflows, and increased workload for staff. The library refused to pay a £600,000 ransom, resulting in ongoing disruptions, fraudulent communications, and staff strikes over pay disputes two years later.

Date Detected: October 2023

Date Publicly Disclosed: October 2023

Type: Cyber Attack

Motivation: Financial (ransom demand)Disruption

Incident : malware distribution

Title: Rhysida ransomware group spoofs Microsoft Teams ads on Bing to deliver OysterLoader and Latrodectus malware

Description: The Rhysida ransomware group conducted a malware distribution campaign by spoofing Microsoft Teams download ads on Bing. Victims searching for Microsoft Teams were redirected to fake download pages that deployed OysterLoader and Latrodectus malware, which can deliver ransomware, backdoors, and infostealers. The group operates on a Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model and has previously targeted airports, libraries, and U.S. school districts.

Date Detected: 2025-06

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07

Type: malware distribution

Attack Vector: malvertisingspoofed adsfake download pages.LNK file abuse

Threat Actor: Rhysida ransomware group

Motivation: financial gainransomware deploymentdata theft

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through spoofed Bing adsfake Microsoft Teams download pages.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Systems Affected: Technology infrastructure of the British Library

Operational Impact: Access to knowledge collectionsPatient fatalities in NHS organizations

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Data Compromised: Staff personal details (addresses, passport scans), Operational data

Systems Affected: Digital ordering systemsEbooksArchives and manuscripts catalogueOnline journal articlesLibrary management systems

Downtime: Ongoing (2+ years as of 2025)

Operational Impact: Manual workflows (paper-based orders)Increased staff workloadService unavailabilityStaff abuse from frustrated usersStrikes due to pay disputes

Customer Complaints: ['User frustration', 'Abuse toward front-facing staff', 'Physical objects thrown at staff']

Brand Reputation Impact: Negative publicityStaff dissatisfactionPublic criticism over pay disputes

Identity Theft Risk: ['Fraudulent calls/emails/texts to staff', 'Exposed addresses/passport scans on dark web']

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Brand Reputation Impact: potential reputational damage to Microsoft/Bing due to spoofed ads

Identity Theft Risk: ['high (due to infostealers)']

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Employment Records, Passport Scans, Addresses and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Entity Name: British Library

Entity Type: Public Sector

Industry: Education

Location: UK

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Entity Name: NHS

Entity Type: Public Sector

Industry: Healthcare

Location: UK

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Entity Name: Schools

Entity Type: Public Sector

Industry: Education

Location: UK

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Entity Name: Local Councils

Entity Type: Public Sector

Industry: Government

Location: UK

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Entity Name: Critical National Infrastructure Operators

Entity Type: Public Sector

Industry: Energy, Transportation, Telecommunications

Location: UK

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Entity Name: British Library

Entity Type: National Library

Industry: Culture/Education

Location: London, UK

Size: Large (170+ million items, 300+ staff on strike)

Customers Affected: Library users (global), staff (300+)

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Entity Name: Microsoft (Bing/Microsoft Teams spoofing)

Entity Type: technology corporation

Industry: software/technology

Location: global

Size: large-scale enterprise

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Entity Name: Unspecified victims (users clicking spoofed ads)

Entity Type: individuals, organizations

Location: global

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Containment Measures: Robust backup strategiesAir-gapped storage systemsTested disaster recovery procedures

Enhanced Monitoring: NCSC Early Warning service

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Containment Measures: Refusal to pay £600,000 ransomManual workflows implemented

Remediation Measures: Partial system restoration (digital forms for orders)Ongoing recovery efforts

Recovery Measures: Gradual service restorationNegotiations with trade unions

Communication Strategy: Public acknowledgment of impactUnion engagements for pay disputes

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Third Party Assistance: Expel (Security Researchers).

Communication Strategy: public disclosure via The Register/TechRadar

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Expel (security researchers), .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Data Exfiltration: Encrypted file systemsSensitive data

Data Encryption: ['AES-256', 'RSA-2048']

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Employment records, Passport scans, Addresses

Sensitivity of Data: High (PII, government-issued IDs)

File Types Exposed: Database recordsScanned documents (passports)

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Data Exfiltration: potential (via infostealers/backdoors)

Personally Identifiable Information: potential (via infostealers)

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Partial system restoration (digital forms for orders), Ongoing recovery efforts, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by robust backup strategies, air-gapped storage systems, tested disaster recovery procedures, , refusal to pay £600,000 ransom, manual workflows implemented and .

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Data Encryption: ['AES-256', 'RSA-2048']

Data Exfiltration: True

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Ransom Demanded: £600,000

Data Encryption: True

Data Exfiltration: True

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Ransomware Strain: Rhysidapotential secondary ransomware via OysterLoader/Latrodectus

Data Encryption: ['potential (via ransomware payloads)']

Data Exfiltration: ['potential (via infostealers/backdoors)']

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Gradual service restoration, Negotiations with trade unions, .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Regulatory Notifications: Mandatory incident notification protocols

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Lessons Learned: The measures represent a fundamental shift in approaching ransomware threats, aiming to disrupt the cyber criminal business model while protecting critical services.

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Lessons Learned: Critical reliance on digital systems in modern libraries, Need for robust incident response and staff support, Long-term operational impacts of ransomware refusal, Importance of addressing staff welfare post-breach

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Lessons Learned: Malvertising campaigns exploiting trusted brands (e.g., Microsoft Teams) and search engines (Bing) can effectively bypass user skepticism. Continuous monitoring of ad networks and proactive takedowns of spoofed pages are critical to mitigating such threats. Users should verify download sources and avoid clicking on ads, even from reputable platforms.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Recommendations: Adopt Cyber Essentials certification framework, Utilize NCSC Early Warning serviceAdopt Cyber Essentials certification framework, Utilize NCSC Early Warning service

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Recommendations: Invest in cyber resilience and backup systems, Improve staff compensation and mental health support, Enhance dark web monitoring for leaked data, Accelerate system restoration to reduce manual workloads, Transparency in post-incident communicationsInvest in cyber resilience and backup systems, Improve staff compensation and mental health support, Enhance dark web monitoring for leaked data, Accelerate system restoration to reduce manual workloads, Transparency in post-incident communicationsInvest in cyber resilience and backup systems, Improve staff compensation and mental health support, Enhance dark web monitoring for leaked data, Accelerate system restoration to reduce manual workloads, Transparency in post-incident communicationsInvest in cyber resilience and backup systems, Improve staff compensation and mental health support, Enhance dark web monitoring for leaked data, Accelerate system restoration to reduce manual workloads, Transparency in post-incident communicationsInvest in cyber resilience and backup systems, Improve staff compensation and mental health support, Enhance dark web monitoring for leaked data, Accelerate system restoration to reduce manual workloads, Transparency in post-incident communications

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Recommendations: Implement stricter ad verification processes on platforms like Bing to prevent spoofing., Educate users on recognizing fake download pages and verifying URLs before downloading software., Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block malware like OysterLoader and Latrodectus., Monitor dark web/underground forums for signs of Rhysida affiliate activity or stolen data sales., Enhance email/web filtering to block malicious .LNK files and associated payloads.Implement stricter ad verification processes on platforms like Bing to prevent spoofing., Educate users on recognizing fake download pages and verifying URLs before downloading software., Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block malware like OysterLoader and Latrodectus., Monitor dark web/underground forums for signs of Rhysida affiliate activity or stolen data sales., Enhance email/web filtering to block malicious .LNK files and associated payloads.Implement stricter ad verification processes on platforms like Bing to prevent spoofing., Educate users on recognizing fake download pages and verifying URLs before downloading software., Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block malware like OysterLoader and Latrodectus., Monitor dark web/underground forums for signs of Rhysida affiliate activity or stolen data sales., Enhance email/web filtering to block malicious .LNK files and associated payloads.Implement stricter ad verification processes on platforms like Bing to prevent spoofing., Educate users on recognizing fake download pages and verifying URLs before downloading software., Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block malware like OysterLoader and Latrodectus., Monitor dark web/underground forums for signs of Rhysida affiliate activity or stolen data sales., Enhance email/web filtering to block malicious .LNK files and associated payloads.Implement stricter ad verification processes on platforms like Bing to prevent spoofing., Educate users on recognizing fake download pages and verifying URLs before downloading software., Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block malware like OysterLoader and Latrodectus., Monitor dark web/underground forums for signs of Rhysida affiliate activity or stolen data sales., Enhance email/web filtering to block malicious .LNK files and associated payloads.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The measures represent a fundamental shift in approaching ransomware threats, aiming to disrupt the cyber criminal business model while protecting critical services.Critical reliance on digital systems in modern libraries,Need for robust incident response and staff support,Long-term operational impacts of ransomware refusal,Importance of addressing staff welfare post-breachMalvertising campaigns exploiting trusted brands (e.g., Microsoft Teams) and search engines (Bing) can effectively bypass user skepticism. Continuous monitoring of ad networks and proactive takedowns of spoofed pages are critical to mitigating such threats. Users should verify download sources and avoid clicking on ads, even from reputable platforms.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware THE952072325

Source: UK Government Announcement

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Source: The Independent

URL: https://www.independent.co.uk

Date Accessed: 2025-10-XX

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Source: TechRadar (via The Register)

URL: https://www.techradar.com

Date Accessed: 2025-07

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Source: Expel (security research)

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: UK Government Announcement, and Source: The IndependentUrl: https://www.independent.co.ukDate Accessed: 2025-10-XX, and Source: TechRadar (via The Register)Url: https://www.techradar.comDate Accessed: 2025-07, and Source: Expel (security research).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Investigation Status: Ongoing (as of 2025)

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Investigation Status: ongoing (as of July 2025)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Acknowledgment Of Impact, Union Engagements For Pay Disputes and Public Disclosure Via The Register/Techradar.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Stakeholder Advisories: Trade Union (Pcs) Engagements, Public Statements On Pay Disputes.

Customer Advisories: Service disruption noticesApologies for prolonged outages

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Customer Advisories: Users advised to avoid clicking on Bing ads for Microsoft Teams and verify download sources.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Trade Union (Pcs) Engagements, Public Statements On Pay Disputes, Service Disruption Notices, Apologies For Prolonged Outages, , Users Advised To Avoid Clicking On Bing Ads For Microsoft Teams And Verify Download Sources. and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

High Value Targets: Staff Pii, Library Management Systems,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Staff Pii, Library Management Systems,

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Entry Point: Spoofed Bing Ads, Fake Microsoft Teams Download Pages,

Backdoors Established: ['via Latrodectus/OysterLoader']

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Cyber Attack THE4992549110125

Root Causes: Inadequate Cybersecurity Defenses (Specifics Undisclosed), Lack Of Redundant Manual Systems, Delayed Recovery Timeline,

Corrective Actions: Partial System Restorations, Union Negotiations For Staff Pay, Dark Web Monitoring For Leaked Data,

Incident : malware distribution THE2092420110325

Root Causes: Lack Of Ad Verification On Bing Allowing Spoofed Microsoft Teams Ads., User Trust In Branded Ads/Search Results Leading To Clicks On Malicious Links., Effective Use Of .Lnk Files To Bypass Initial Security Controls.,

Corrective Actions: Bing/Microsoft To Implement Stricter Ad Vetting For Branded Keywords (E.G., 'Microsoft Teams')., Security Awareness Training For Users On Identifying Malvertising., Proactive Hunting For Rhysida-Affiliated Malware (Oysterloader, Latrodectus) In Enterprise Environments.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Ncsc Early Warning Service, , Expel (Security Researchers), .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Partial System Restorations, Union Negotiations For Staff Pay, Dark Web Monitoring For Leaked Data, , Bing/Microsoft To Implement Stricter Ad Vetting For Branded Keywords (E.G., 'Microsoft Teams')., Security Awareness Training For Users On Identifying Malvertising., Proactive Hunting For Rhysida-Affiliated Malware (Oysterloader, Latrodectus) In Enterprise Environments., .

Additional Questions

General Information

What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was £600,000.

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Rhysida ransomware group.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on October 2023.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-07.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Staff personal details (addresses, passport scans), Operational data and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Technology infrastructure of the British Library and Digital ordering systemsEbooksArchives and manuscripts catalogueOnline journal articlesLibrary management systems.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was expel (security researchers), .

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Robust backup strategiesAir-gapped storage systemsTested disaster recovery procedures, Refusal to pay £600 and000 ransomManual workflows implemented.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Operational data, Staff personal details (addresses and passport scans).

Ransomware Information

What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was £600,000.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Importance of addressing staff welfare post-breach, Malvertising campaigns exploiting trusted brands (e.g., Microsoft Teams) and search engines (Bing) can effectively bypass user skepticism. Continuous monitoring of ad networks and proactive takedowns of spoofed pages are critical to mitigating such threats. Users should verify download sources and avoid clicking on ads, even from reputable platforms.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Invest in cyber resilience and backup systems, Improve staff compensation and mental health support, Monitor dark web/underground forums for signs of Rhysida affiliate activity or stolen data sales., Implement stricter ad verification processes on platforms like Bing to prevent spoofing., Adopt Cyber Essentials certification framework, Utilize NCSC Early Warning service, Accelerate system restoration to reduce manual workloads, Transparency in post-incident communications, Enhance email/web filtering to block malicious .LNK files and associated payloads., Educate users on recognizing fake download pages and verifying URLs before downloading software., Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect and block malware like OysterLoader and Latrodectus. and Enhance dark web monitoring for leaked data.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Expel (security research), UK Government Announcement, TechRadar (via The Register) and The Independent.

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.independent.co.uk, https://www.techradar.com .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (as of 2025).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Trade union (PCS) engagements, Public statements on pay disputes, .

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Service disruption noticesApologies for prolonged outages and Users advised to avoid clicking on Bing ads for Microsoft Teams and verify download sources.

Initial Access Broker

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Inadequate cybersecurity defenses (specifics undisclosed)Lack of redundant manual systemsDelayed recovery timeline, Lack of ad verification on Bing allowing spoofed Microsoft Teams ads.User trust in branded ads/search results leading to clicks on malicious links.Effective use of .LNK files to bypass initial security controls..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Partial system restorationsUnion negotiations for staff payDark web monitoring for leaked data, Bing/Microsoft to implement stricter ad vetting for branded keywords (e.g., 'Microsoft Teams').Security awareness training for users on identifying malvertising.Proactive hunting for Rhysida-affiliated malware (OysterLoader, Latrodectus) in enterprise environments..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=the-british-library' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge