Comparison Overview

The British Library

VS

Patchogue-Medford Library

The British Library

96 Euston Road, London, GB, NW1 2DB
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 600 and 649

We are the UK’s national library. We give access to the world’s most comprehensive collection of over 170 million items - a living collection that grows every single day. Dating back 3,000 years, the collection includes Shakespeare’s First Folio, Magna Carta, a rare recording of Florence Nightingale and even Sylvia Pankhurst’s poems written on toilet paper from prison… But the collection also includes this morning’s newspapers, blogs and tweets, as well as a copy of every UK domain website. Our collection helps to open up a world of ideas. It can inspire people to start businesses. Spark new works of art and literature. Make scientific discoveries. Visit bl.uk to start your journey of discovery.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 1,306
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Patchogue-Medford Library

54-60 E Main St, Patchogue, NY 11772, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Patchogue-Medford Library is to provide resources and opportunities to empower, educate and entertain the community. The Library is a School District Public Library serving the residents of the Patchogue-Medford School District. The District encompasses the Incorporated Village of Patchogue and the hamlets of North Patchogue, Medford and a portion of East Patchogue. The area is 15.5 square miles extending from the Great South Bay in Patchogue to Granny Road in Medford. Waverly Avenue and North Ocean Avenue form the western border of the district. The eastern border of the district extends from Roe Avenue and South Country Road in Patchogue to just east of White Pine Way in Medford.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-british-library.jpeg
The British Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-medford-library.jpeg
Patchogue-Medford Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The British Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Patchogue-Medford Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The British Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patchogue-Medford Library in 2025.

Incident History — The British Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The British Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Patchogue-Medford Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patchogue-Medford Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-british-library.jpeg
The British Library
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial (ransom demand), Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: malvertising, spoofed ads, fake download pages, .LNK file abuse
Motivation: financial gain, ransomware deployment, data theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-medford-library.jpeg
Patchogue-Medford Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Patchogue-Medford Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The British Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The British Library company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Patchogue-Medford Library company has not reported any.

In the current year, Patchogue-Medford Library company and The British Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

The British Library company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Patchogue-Medford Library company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Patchogue-Medford Library company nor The British Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

The British Library company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Patchogue-Medford Library company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The British Library company nor Patchogue-Medford Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The British Library nor Patchogue-Medford Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The British Library company nor Patchogue-Medford Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The British Library company employs more people globally than Patchogue-Medford Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither The British Library nor Patchogue-Medford Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The British Library nor Patchogue-Medford Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The British Library nor Patchogue-Medford Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The British Library nor Patchogue-Medford Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The British Library nor Patchogue-Medford Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The British Library nor Patchogue-Medford Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H