Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » The Apache Software Foundation » THE1775629469

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (THE1775629469)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-9
Company Score Before Incident604 / 1000
Company Score After Incident595 / 1000
Company LinkView The Apache Software Foundation Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERTHE1775629469
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of Jolokia REST API via crafted `vm://` URI
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of The Apache Software Foundation's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts The Apache Software Foundation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the The Apache Software Foundation breach identified under incident ID THE1775629469.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of The Apache Software Foundation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-apache-software-foundation, the number of followers: 83098, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 2496 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 604 and after the incident was 595 with a difference of -9 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on The Apache Software Foundation and their customers.

Apache ActiveMQ recently reported "13-Year-Old Apache ActiveMQ RCE Flaw Discovered by AI Assistant", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Classic, tracked as CVE-2026-34197, has been uncovered after remaining undetected for 13 years.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Apache ActiveMQ Classic (versions 5.x and 6.x).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Upgrade to versions 5.19.4 or 6.2.3, remove `vm://` transport capability from remote operations, and began remediation that includes Change default credentials, monitor logs for suspicious `vm://` URIs, watch for unexpected POST requests to `/api/jolokia/` containing `addNetworkConnector`.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as AI-assisted vulnerability hunting can significantly accelerate discovery of critical flaws. Default credentials and over-permissive configurations remain a major security risk, and recommending next steps like Upgrade to patched versions (5.19.4 or 6.2.3), change default credentials, monitor for suspicious activity, and restrict Jolokia API permissions.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploit targets Jolokia, a REST API interface in ActiveMQ’s web-based management console, Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation requires administrator credentials (e.g., default `admin such as admin`), and Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (T1078.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating default `admin such as admin` credentials required for exploitation in most versions. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating forcing the message broker to download and run a malicious remote configuration file and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating execute arbitrary commands by supplying a crafted `vm such as //` URI. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating grants full system control via `addNetworkConnector` operation with crafted `vm such as //` URI. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Modify Registry (T1112) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating malicious remote configuration file execution may modify system settings and Indicator Removal: Timestomp (T1070.006) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerability remained undetected for 13 years. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating full system control by attackers via RCE. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (80%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (90%)
Defense Evasion
Modify Registry (50%)
Indicator Removal: Timestomp (40%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)

Sources & References