Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Thales » NXPTHASTM1775572928

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NXPTHASTM1775572928)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-3
Company Score Before Incident760 / 1000
Company Score After Incident757 / 1000
Company LinkView Thales Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERNXPTHASTM1775572928
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORLocal
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE06/04/2026
STATUSPatched

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Thales's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Thales Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Thales breach identified under incident ID NXPTHASTM1775572928.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Thales's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/thales, the number of followers: 1889152, the industry type: Defense and Space Manufacturing and the number of employees: 62949 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 757 with a difference of -3 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Thales and their customers.

Google recently reported "Google Patches Critical Zero-Interaction Android Vulnerability in April 2026 Security Update", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Google’s April 2026 Android Security Bulletin addresses multiple high-risk vulnerabilities, including a critical zero-interaction flaw in the Android Framework (CVE-2026-0049) that allows attackers to execute a local denial-of-service (DoS) attack without user interaction or e...

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Android devices (versions 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Patches released via 2026-04-01 and 2026-04-05 security patch levels, and began remediation that includes Security updates provided to device manufacturers; AOSP source code patches within 48 hours, and stakeholders are being briefed through Android Security Bulletin published; users advised to verify security patch level.

The case underscores how Patched, and recommending next steps like Users should update to security patch level 2026-04-05 or later to ensure full protection, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Device manufacturers notified in advance for timely updates.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating critical zero-interaction flaw in the Android Framework (CVE-2026-0049). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating execute a local denial-of-service (DoS) attack without user interaction and Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rendering affected devices unresponsive (CVE-2026-0049). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating high-severity flaw in the StrongBox hardware-backed key storage system (CVE-2025-48651). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating zero-interaction flaw...without user interaction or elevated privileges. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploitation of Remote Services (50%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (90%)
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
Defense Evasion
Exploitation for Defense Evasion (60%)

Sources & References