Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation » TEX1782132877

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TEX1782132877)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-106
Company Score Before Incident749 / 1000
Company Score After Incident643 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTEX1782132877
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party vendor compromise
DATA EXPOSEDDriver’s license numbers, passport numbers,...
INCIDENT DATE17/06/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation breach identified under incident ID TEX1782132877.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/texas-parks-and-wildlife-foundation, the number of followers: 4240, the industry type: Environmental Services and the number of employees: 30 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 643 with a difference of -106 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation and their customers.

On 18 June 2026, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Texas Hunting & Fishing License Breach Exposes Data of 3 Million".

A cyberattack on a third-party vendor handling hunting and fishing license sales for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) has potentially exposed the personal information of over 3 million license holders.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Third-party vendor handling hunting and fishing license sales, and exposing Driver’s license numbers, passport numbers, email addresses, phone numbers, residential addresses, with nearly 3,000,000 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Enhanced security measures, stronger access controls, and began remediation that includes Additional safeguards, monitoring services, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure, credit monitoring offer.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Vulnerabilities posed by third-party vendors in government data systems, and recommending next steps like Strengthen third-party vendor security assessments, implement enhanced monitoring and access controls, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering One year of free credit monitoring through Kroll (enrollment open until September 14, 2026).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack on a third-party vendor handling hunting and fishing license sales and Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor handling hunting and fishing license sales for TPWD. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor compromise may involve unauthorized access to license systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating driver’s license numbers, passport numbers, email addresses compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of 3 million license holders exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting 3 million individuals; exfiltration likely and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor systems may have cloud-based data storage. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but large-scale exposure and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential misuse of stolen data for identity theft. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Compromise Software Supply Chain (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References