Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth South » TEX1772238725

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TEX1772238725)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-64
Company Score Before Incident765 / 1000
Company Score After Incident701 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTEX1772238725
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and protected health...
INCIDENT DATE26/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth South's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth South Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth South breach identified under incident ID TEX1772238725.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth South's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/texas-health-huguley-hospital-fort-worth-south, the number of followers: 3007, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 675 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 701 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth South and their customers.

On 27 February 2026, The College of Health Care Professions (CHCP) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Cybersecurity Breach at The College of Health Care Professions Exposes Sensitive Data".

The College of Health Care Professions (CHCP), a Texas-based healthcare career college operating under Texas Medical Careers, Limited and Empowerment Schools – Healthcare Ltd, reported a data breach involving unauthorized access to sensitive personal and protected health infor...

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal and protected health information (PHI).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifying affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifying affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive personal and protected health information and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating breach origin or attack vector not publicly disclosed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive data suggests credential compromise and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on breach origin, but brute force possible. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating government-issued IDs, financial info, PII compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pHI and PII exposed from institutional databases. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive data breach with undisclosed number of individuals affected and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on exfiltration method, but cloud transfer possible. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential implications for identity theft and financial fraud and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on data integrity post-breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process (50%)
Brute Force (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Data Destruction (30%)

Sources & References