Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ROGCYBTES1770724900)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Tesseract Intelligence's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Tesseract Intelligence Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Tesseract Intelligence breach identified under incident ID ROGCYBTES1770724900.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Tesseract Intelligence's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tesseract-intelligence, the number of followers: 5956, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 14 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 595 with a difference of -154 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Tesseract Intelligence and their customers.
Iron Mountain recently reported "Ransomware Surge in January 2026: Shifting Targets and Emerging Threats", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
January 2026 marked a sharp rise in ransomware activity, with 711 attacks recorded.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 104 TB, with nearly 13,300 (Mt. Spokane Pediatrics and Pecan Tree Dental) records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Evolving ransomware tactics, shifting focus to high-value sectors, and delayed disclosures obscuring attack timelines.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating finance and tech sectors became prime targets, seeing 24% and 12% increases, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gangs shifting focus to high-value sectors, and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating banking data exposed (Rogers Capital Credit). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware type attack with data encryption and exfiltration and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (LockBit, Qilin, etc.) likely use scripts. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating banking data and PII exposed suggests account compromise. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating high-value targets (finance, government) suggest privilege abuse. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (LockBit, Qilin) known for obfuscation and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating delayed disclosures obscure attack timelines. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating banking data and PII exposed (Rogers Capital Credit) and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating high-value sectors targeted (finance, government). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified System Information Discovery (T1082) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 104 TB of data stolen across multiple sectors and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration (1.4 TB from Iron Mountain). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 104 TB of data stolen, including patient records and banking data and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating high-volume data theft (13.6 TB by Sinobi). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gangs (Qilin, LockBit) use C2 for exfiltration. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 104 TB of data stolen, including 1.4 TB from Iron Mountain and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating delayed disclosures suggest covert exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack with data encryption confirmed, Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating operation cancellations (AZ Monica hospital), and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gangs may deface systems for extortion. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Tesseract Intelligence Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/tesseract-intelligence/incident/ROGCYBTES1770724900
- Tesseract Intelligence CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/tesseract-intelligence
- Tesseract Intelligence Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/rogcybtes1770724900-witzenberg-municipality-trocaire-college-rogers-capital-credit-ransomware-january-2026/
- Tesseract Intelligence CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/tesseract-intelligence/history
- Tesseract Intelligence CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.comparitech.com/news/ransomware-roundup-january-2026/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf