Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Tennessee Titans » TEN1779820089

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TEN1779820089)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-65
Company Score Before Incident764 / 1000
Company Score After Incident699 / 1000
Company LinkView Tennessee Titans Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERTEN1779820089
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORHacking
DATA EXPOSEDExplicit video content
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Tennessee Titans's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Tennessee Titans Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Tennessee Titans breach identified under incident ID TEN1779820089.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Tennessee Titans's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tennessee-titans, the number of followers: 55069, the industry type: Spectator Sports and the number of employees: 612 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 764 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -65 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Tennessee Titans and their customers.

Will Levis recently reported "Will Levis Explicit Video Leak", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Tennessee Titans quarterback Will Levis faced a privacy breach when an explicit video involving him and his ex-girlfriend surfaced online.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Explicit video content, plus an estimated financial loss of Significant (cost of hiring cybersecurity specialist).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Content removal efforts, and stakeholders are being briefed through Limited (no public comment from Will Levis).

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating breach originated years earlier...attributing it to an Eastern European hacking group and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hacking by Eastern European group during college years. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach originated during Levis’ college career (potential weak security). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating explicit video content was compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating explicit video surfaced online (implied exfiltration). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating content removal efforts (partial destruction) and Disk Wipe: Disk Content Wipe (T1561.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating traces of such material often persist online indefinitely. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach occurred during college years (potential account misuse) and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating traces of such material often persist online indefinitely. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Compromise Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Disk Wipe: Disk Content Wipe (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)

Sources & References