What is the official website of Tempur Sealy International ?

The official website of Tempur Sealy International is http://www.tempursealy.com/.

What is Tempur Sealy International's cybersecurity risk score?

Tempur Sealy International has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 727 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Tempur Sealy International experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Tempur Sealy International currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Tempur Sealy International been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Tempur Sealy International has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Tempur Sealy International have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Tempur Sealy International is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Tempur Sealy International have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Tempur Sealy International does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Tempur Sealy International comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Tempur Sealy International is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Tempur Sealy International have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Tempur Sealy International does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Tempur Sealy International comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Tempur Sealy International is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Tempur Sealy International have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Tempur Sealy International is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Tempur Sealy International operate in ?

Tempur Sealy International operates primarily in the Consumer Goods industry.

How many employees does Tempur Sealy International have ?

Tempur Sealy International employs approximately 2,693 people worldwide.

Does Tempur Sealy International own any subsidiaries ?

Tempur Sealy International presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Tempur Sealy International have ?

Tempur Sealy International's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 33,225 followers.

Does Tempur Sealy International have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Tempur Sealy International does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Tempur Sealy International have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Tempur Sealy International maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tempur-pedic.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Tempur Sealy International experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Tempur Sealy International has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Tempur Sealy International have ?

Tempur Sealy International has an estimated 1,653 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Tempur Sealy International faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

TSI

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

727

/1000

Moderate

752

/1000

Fair

Tempur Sealy International Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

tempursealy.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Iconic brands. Storied history. Industry-leading innovation. Tempur Sealy International, Inc. is the world's largest bedding provider. The company develops, manufactures and markets mattresses, adjustable bases, pillows and other sleep and relaxation products. Combining a proud history and groundbreaking innovation, the company holds some of the most highly recognized brands in the industry: Tempur®, Tempur-Pedic®, Cocoon™ by Sealy, Sealy®, and Stearns & Foster®.

TSI A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

TSI

Tempur Sealy International CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Tempur Sealy Intern...

Breach

100

3/2022

TEM838072725

Tempur Sealy Intern...

Breach

4/2017

TEM522072525

Tempur Sealy Intern...

Breach

100

2/2016

TEM946072825

Loading…

A.I.

TSI Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for TSI

Incidents vs Consumer Goods Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tempur Sealy International in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tempur Sealy International in 2026.

Incident Types TSI vs Consumer Goods Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tempur Sealy International in 2026.

Incident History - TSI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Tempur Sealy International Subsidiaries

Parent Company

TSI

Consumer Goods

Website: http://www.tempursealy.com/

Company Size: 2,693

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Tempur Sealy International Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Tempur Sealy International CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 27, 2026 09:15 PM

SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. SEC 10-K Report

Somnigroup International Inc., a leading player in the global bedding industry, has released its 2025 Form 10-K report,...

Read Article

February 06, 2026 07:16 PM

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

Ransomware Health Data Breach Affects 500,000 Patients. On June 26, 2017, Airway Oxygen, a provider of oxygen therapy and home medical equipment,...

Read Article

August 07, 2025 07:00 AM

Foley Represents Fullpower-AI in Strategic $25M Investment from Tempur Sealy International Concurrently With 10-Year Global Licensing Agreement

Foley & Lardner LLP represented Fullpower-AI, a leader in AI-powered health and wellness technologies, in securing a transformative...

Read Article

August 07, 2025 07:00 AM

Fullpower-AI Secures 10-Year Global Licensing Agreement and Strategic Investment from Tempur Sealy International to Power the Future of Smartbeds

Fullpower-AI®, a leader in AI-powered health and wellness technologies, today announced a transformative partnership with Tempur Sealy...

Read Article

February 18, 2025 08:00 AM

Tempur Sealy Completes Name Change to Somnigroup International

Somnigroup International Inc. (NYSE: SGI, "Company" or "Somnigroup"), formerly Tempur Sealy International, today announced the completion of...

Read Article

February 09, 2025 08:00 AM

Tempur Sealy International, Inc. (NYSE:TPX) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 68% of the company

Key Insights Significantly high institutional ownership implies Tempur Sealy International's stock price is sensitive...

Read Article

February 06, 2025 08:00 AM

Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Defeat FTC Preliminary Injunction in $5 Billion Deal

Cleary Gottlieb represented Tempur Sealy International Inc. (Tempur Sealy) at trial in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of...

Read Article

February 05, 2025 08:00 AM

Tempur Sealy International, Inc. to Change its Name to Somnigroup International Inc.

In connection with the closing of its acquisition of Mattress Firm, Tempur Sealy International, Inc. (NYSE: TPX, "Company" or "Tempur...

Read Article

February 05, 2025 08:00 AM

Tempur Sealy Acquires Mattress Firm | News

Cleary Gottlieb represented Tempur Sealy International Inc. (Tempur Sealy) in its acquisition of Mattress Firm Group Inc. (Mattress Firm), the nation's largest...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…