Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » TELUS Digital » TEL1773419339

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TEL1773419339)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-21
Company Score Before Incident561 / 1000
Company Score After Incident540 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTEL1773419339
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE12/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of TELUS Digital's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts TELUS Digital Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the TELUS Digital breach identified under incident ID TEL1773419339.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of TELUS Digital's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/telus-digital, the number of followers: 999992, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 39811 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 561 and after the incident was 540 with a difference of -21 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on TELUS Digital and their customers.

Telus Digital recently reported "Telus Digital Cyberattack Investigation", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Telus Corp.’s global IT and customer services division, Telus Digital, is probing a cyberattack that resulted in unauthorized access to a 'limited number' of its systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting limited number of systems.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Will notify affected customers as the investigation progresses.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Will notify affected customers as the investigation progresses.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to a limited number of its systems and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating immediate measures were taken to contain the intrusion (implies account misuse). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating access to a limited number of its systems (suggests lateral spread). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating immediate measures taken to contain the intrusion (implies evasion attempts). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to systems (implies potential data exfiltration). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services (40%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)

Sources & References