Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MIT xPRO | Tech CEO ProgramMIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program
VS
University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program

MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program

Cambridge, US

Last Update: 09/06/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

The seven- to eight-month Tech CEO Program from MIT xPRO, is focused on elevating your leadership skills among senior stakeholders, leveraging emerging technologies, and fostering innovation. Enrollment Partner: Emeritus

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of California

University of California

1111 Franklin St, Oakland, 94607, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

No other university does as much for so many as the University of California. For almost 150 years, the University of California has educated the brightest minds and helped California become a beacon of innovation. Our campuses routinely are ranked among the best in the...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:149,251
Subsidiaries:59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program

MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of California

University of California

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of California in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program

MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of California

University of California

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program company and University of California company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program and University of California, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program and University of California, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program or University of California ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program or University of California ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program and University of California, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MIT xPRO | Tech CEO Program and University of California, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA