Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tata Steel NederlandTata Steel Nederland
VS
AngloGold AshantiAngloGold Ashanti
Tata Steel Nederland

Tata Steel Nederland

Wenckebachstraat 1, Velsen-Noord, 1951 JZ, NL

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
691/1000Weak

Tata Steel Nederland is one of Europe’s leading steel producers. The company supplies high-quality steel products to the most demanding markets, including construction, automotive, packaging and engineering. Tata Steel Nederland has sites in the Netherlands, Belgium, Ge...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:4,574
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

Greenwood Village, Denver, 80111, US

Last Update: 15/06/2026

View Profile
812/1000Good

AngloGold Ashanti plc is a global gold mining company with a diverse, high-quality portfolio of operations, projects and exploration activities across 10 countries on four continents. We pursue value-creating opportunities involving other minerals, where we can leverage...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:12,992
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tata Steel Nederland

Tata Steel Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Steel Nederland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AngloGold Ashanti in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tata Steel Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Steel Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AngloGold Ashanti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AngloGold Ashanti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tata Steel Nederland

Tata Steel Nederland

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TAT1777667117
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tata Steel Nederland or AngloGold Ashanti ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tata Steel Nederland or AngloGold Ashanti ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tata Steel Nederland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1