Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tango LuxembourgTango Luxembourg
VS
Cox CommunicationsCox Communications
Tango Luxembourg

Tango Luxembourg

18, Rue du Puits Romain, Bertrange, L-8070, LU

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tango.lu
752/1000Fair

Tango est le premier opérateur alternatif luxembourgeois proposant des services de TV, internet, téléphonie fixe et mobile aux clients résidentiels, indépendants et petites entreprises. Avec au cœur de son ADN un goût certain pour le challenge, la simplicité et la clar...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cox Communications

Cox Communications

6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, 30328, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cox.com
754/1000Fair

Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,319
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tango Luxembourg

Tango Luxembourg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cox Communications

Cox Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tango Luxembourg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tango Luxembourg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tango Luxembourg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tango Luxembourg

Tango Luxembourg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cox Communications

Cox Communications

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COX2035161122
🔒 Incident : Breach
COX152930322

FAQ

Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tango Luxembourg company and Cox Communications company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tango Luxembourg and Cox Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tango Luxembourg and Cox Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tango Luxembourg or Cox Communications ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tango Luxembourg or Cox Communications ?
Between Tango Luxembourg and Cox Communications, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tango Luxembourg and Cox Communications, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5