Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Tampa Bay Periodontics » TAM1779209291

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TAM1779209291)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-69
Company Score Before Incident764 / 1000
Company Score After Incident695 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTAM1779209291
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and medical information, including...
INCIDENT DATE07/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Tampa Bay Periodontics's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Tampa Bay Periodontics Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Tampa Bay Periodontics breach identified under incident ID TAM1779209291.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Tampa Bay Periodontics's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tampa-bay-periodontics, the number of followers: 11, the industry type: Health, Wellness & Fitness and the number of employees: 7 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 764 and after the incident was 695 with a difference of -69 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Tampa Bay Periodontics and their customers.

On 08 March 2026, Tampa Bay Dental Implants & Periodontics disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Tampa Bay Dental Implants & Periodontics Data Breach".

Tampa Bay Dental Implants & Periodontics suffered a data breach affecting approximately 6,400 patients, exposing personal and medical information including names, contact details, dates of birth, clinical histories, treatment notes, Social Security numbers, and financial infor...

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and medical information, including names, contact details, dates of birth, clinical histories, treatment notes, Social Security numbers, and financial information, with nearly 6400 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Security notice published on the firm's website.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Security notice published on the firm's website.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating personal and medical information...was exposed and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting approximately 6,400 patients. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, financial information compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating clinical histories, treatment notes exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, contact details, dates of birth, clinical histories and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating medical information...was exposed via the practice. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting approximately 6,400 patients and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high sensitivity of exposed data (SSNs, financial info). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential compensation claims for financial losses. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (40%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References