Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Take-Two InteractiveTake-Two Interactive
VS
Universal Orlando ResortUniversal Orlando Resort
Take-Two Interactive

Take-Two Interactive

110 W 44th St, New York, 10036, US

Last Update: 11/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.take2games.com
803/1000Good

Headquartered in New York City, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is a leading developer, publisher, and marketer of interactive entertainment for consumers around the globe. We develop and publish products principally through Rockstar Games, 2K, and Zynga. Our stra...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:1,204
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Universal Orlando Resort

Universal Orlando Resort

1000 Universal Studios Plaza, Orlando, 32819, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

For years, we’ve been creating a legacy of unforgettable experiences for our Guests. Our Guests are immersed into the sights and sounds of some of the greatest movies and most legendary stories, and our Team Members are the ones who help make those incredible experience...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:12,710
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Take-Two Interactive

Take-Two Interactive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Universal Orlando Resort

Universal Orlando Resort

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

Take-Two Interactive has 50.98% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universal Orlando Resort in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Take-Two Interactive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Take-Two Interactive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Universal Orlando Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universal Orlando Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Take-Two Interactive

Take-Two Interactive

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ROCTAKANO1775910501
Universal Orlando Resort

Universal Orlando Resort

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Take-Two Interactive company and Universal Orlando Resort company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Take-Two Interactive and Universal Orlando Resort, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Take-Two Interactive and Universal Orlando Resort, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Take-Two Interactive or Universal Orlando Resort ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Take-Two Interactive or Universal Orlando Resort ?
Between Take-Two Interactive and Universal Orlando Resort, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Take-Two Interactive and Universal Orlando Resort, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9