Comparison Overview
T-Mobile Polska
T-Mobile Polska
ul. Marynarska , Warszawa, 02-674, PL
Last Update: 22/03/2026
Hi! We are T-Mobile. We are part of Deutsche Telekom, the largest operator in the European Union and one of the leaders of the telecommunications market in Poland. You probably think that we are only a telecommunications company. Well, not at all! We are a technology c...
Safaricom PLC
Waiyaki Way, Westlands, Nairobi, P.O. Box 66827, 00800, Nairobi , KE
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Safaricom is the leading provider of converged communication solutions in Kenya. In addition to providing a broad range of first-class products and services for Telephony, Broadband Internet and Financial services, Safaricom seeks to uplift the welfare of Kenyans throug...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
T-Mobile Polska
Safaricom PLC
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for T-Mobile Polska in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Safaricom PLC has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - T-Mobile Polska (X = Date, Y = Severity)
T-Mobile Polska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Safaricom PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Safaricom PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
T-Mobile Polska
Safaricom PLC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.