Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T-Mobile Biznes PolskaT-Mobile Biznes Polska
VS
KPNKPN
T-Mobile Biznes Polska

T-Mobile Biznes Polska

ul. Marynarska 12, Warszawa, Mazowieckie, PL, 02-674

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://biznes.t-mobile.pl
752/1000Fair

T-Mobile Polska is one of the largest telecommunications operators in Poland, providing a full range of mobile and fixed telecommunications services. Thanks to the integration with GTS Poland, T-Mobile has strengthened its position on the B2B market. Currently our B2B c...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:88
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KPN

KPN

Wilhelminakade 123, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, NL, 3072 AP

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kpn.com
796/1000Fair

Welkom bij de LinkedIn pagina van KPN. Sinds jaar en dag maakt KPN technologie toegankelijk. Hier leest u alles over de ontwikkelingen rondom de thema’s die KPN belangrijk vindt, zoals Het Nieuwe Leven & Werken, Veiligheid & Privacy en ICT-infrastructuur. Ook een transp...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:17,865
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T-Mobile Biznes Polska

T-Mobile Biznes Polska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KPN

KPN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Mobile Biznes Polska in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPN in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - T-Mobile Biznes Polska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Mobile Biznes Polska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KPN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T-Mobile Biznes Polska

T-Mobile Biznes Polska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KPN

KPN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and KPN company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and KPN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and KPN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T-Mobile Biznes Polska or KPN ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T-Mobile Biznes Polska or KPN ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and KPN, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and KPN, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1