Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T-Mobile Biznes PolskaT-Mobile Biznes Polska
VS
AT&TAT&T
T-Mobile Biznes Polska

T-Mobile Biznes Polska

ul. Marynarska 12, Warszawa, Mazowieckie, PL, 02-674

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://biznes.t-mobile.pl
752/1000Fair

T-Mobile Polska is one of the largest telecommunications operators in Poland, providing a full range of mobile and fixed telecommunications services. Thanks to the integration with GTS Poland, T-Mobile has strengthened its position on the B2B market. Currently our B2B c...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:88
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AT&T

AT&T

208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.att.com
100/1000Critical

We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:178,894
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
24
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T-Mobile Biznes Polska

T-Mobile Biznes Polska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AT&T

AT&T

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Mobile Biznes Polska in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

AT&T has 450.46% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - T-Mobile Biznes Polska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Mobile Biznes Polska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T-Mobile Biznes Polska

T-Mobile Biznes Polska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AT&T

AT&T

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591
🔒 Incident : Breach
LUMATTVERFBIWINFIN1772764213

FAQ

Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska company and AT&T company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T-Mobile Biznes Polska or AT&T ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T-Mobile Biznes Polska or AT&T ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and AT&T, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T-Mobile Biznes Polska and AT&T, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-10777
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-10775
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.4
Complexity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-22055
SUMMARY

Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-22054
SUMMARY

Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-10771
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9