Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Sysco » SYS1785508066

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SYS1785508066)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-62
Company Score Before Incident740 / 1000
Company Score After Incident678 / 1000
Company LinkView Sysco Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSYS1785508066
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information, including names and...
INCIDENT DATE22/04/2026
STATUSConcluded

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Sysco's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Sysco Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Sysco breach identified under incident ID SYS1785508066.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Sysco's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sysco, the number of followers: 440589, the industry type: Food and Beverage Services and the number of employees: 35617 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 740 and after the incident was 678 with a difference of -62 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Sysco and their customers.

On 22 July 2026, Sysco Corp. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Sysco Corp. Data Breach Exposing Personal Information".

Sysco Corp., the world’s largest foodservice distributor, has notified individuals of a cyberattack that compromised personal data, marking the company’s second major breach in 2026.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Salesforce records, internal corporate systems, and exposing Personal information, including names and Social Security numbers, with nearly Over 61 million Salesforce records records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Contained unauthorized activity in computer systems, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters mailed to impacted individuals, regulatory disclosures.

The case underscores how Concluded, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters mailed to impacted individuals on July 22, 2026; enrollment in identity theft protection required by October 31, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity was identified in parts of Sysco’s computer systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating over 61 million Salesforce records exfiltrated (public-facing app). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating files containing personal information accessed by unauthorized party and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers compromised (high-value credentials). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 61M Salesforce records exfiltrated, including PII and corporate docs and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce records targeted (cloud-based info repository). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters claimed exfiltration of 61M records via Tor network and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor posted exfiltration claim on Tor network (web service). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no confirmation, but high-volume data exfiltration may imply destruction and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence, but unauthorized access may allow manipulation. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce records accessed (cloud-based system compromise) and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity detected post-compromise (delayed detection). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)

Sources & References