Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

General Atomics Synopta GmbHGeneral Atomics Synopta GmbH
VS
SpaceXSpaceX
General Atomics Synopta GmbH

General Atomics Synopta GmbH

Sonderstrasse 7, Eggersriet, 9034, CH

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://ga-synopta.ch/
744/1000Moderate

General Atomics Synopta GmbH, Eggersriet (CH), is a Swiss company that is specialized in the design and production of high data rate laser communication systems and associated equipment for space and ground-based applications. Furthermore, GA Synopta produces optical/me...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SpaceX

SpaceX

Rocket Road, Hawthorne, California, US

Last Update: 11/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.spacex.com
811/1000Good

SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches the world’s most advanced rockets and spacecraft. The company was founded in 2002 by Elon Musk to revolutionize space transportation, with the ultimate goal of making life multiplanetary. SpaceX has gained worldwide attentio...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:20,466
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
General Atomics Synopta GmbH

General Atomics Synopta GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SpaceX

SpaceX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Atomics Synopta GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

SpaceX has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - General Atomics Synopta GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Atomics Synopta GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SpaceX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpaceX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
General Atomics Synopta GmbH

General Atomics Synopta GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SpaceX

SpaceX

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SPA1786416791
🔒 Incident : Breach
SPA1764772314
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEISPATELAIRTHAEURSKY1767888882

FAQ

Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH company and SpaceX company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and SpaceX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and SpaceX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - General Atomics Synopta GmbH or SpaceX ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - General Atomics Synopta GmbH or SpaceX ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and SpaceX, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between General Atomics Synopta GmbH and SpaceX, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9