Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Sygnia » SYG1767124211

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SYG1767124211)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-32
Company Score Before Incident554 / 1000
Company Score After Incident522 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSYG1767124211
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE17/12/2023
STATUSGuilty pleas entered; sentencing scheduled for March 12, 2026

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Sygnia's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Sygnia Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Sygnia breach identified under incident ID SYG1767124211.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Sygnia's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sygnia, the number of followers: 26168, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 260 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 554 and after the incident was 522 with a difference of -32 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Sygnia and their customers.

Florida-based medical device maker recently reported "Two Cyber Pros Admit to Being BlackCat Ransomware Affiliates", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Two cybersecurity professionals who moonlighted as BlackCat ransomware gang affiliates pleaded guilty to using the crypto-locking malware to extort victims in the United States.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of $1.2 million (from one victim).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Guilty pleas entered; sentencing scheduled for March 12, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity professionals exploited their industry expertise and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating recruited for the scheme (implied social engineering). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating deploy BlackCat (Alphv) ransomware against five U.S. companies. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating affiliates received 80% of ransom payments (ongoing access). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including crypto-locking malware to extort victims, and data encryption such as Yes (Ransomware encryption) and Financial Theft (T1657) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including earned at least $1 million from a single victim, and proceeds laundered through cryptocurrency mixing services. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating blackCat RaaS known for data exfiltration (implied). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating blackCat ransomware (known for obfuscation), Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity professionals abusing their skills, and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating blackCat affiliates (implied stealth techniques). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Proxy (T1090) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cryptocurrency mixing services (obfuscated transactions). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating blackCat affiliates (implied RDP abuse). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Financial Theft (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (60%)
Command and Control
Proxy (70%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (60%)

Sources & References