ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

SUSE is a global leader in innovative, reliable and secure enterprise open source solutions, including SUSEⓇ Linux Suite, SUSEⓇ Rancher Suite, SUSEⓇ Edge Suite and SUSEⓇ AI Suite. More than 60% of the Fortune 500 rely on SUSE to power their mission-critical workloads, enabling them to innovate everywhere – from the data center to the cloud, to the edge and beyond. SUSE puts the “open” back in open source, collaborating with partners and communities to give customers the agility to tackle innovation challenges today and the freedom to evolve their strategy and solutions tomorrow. For more information, visit www.suse.com.

SUSE A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

SUSE

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

suse

Employees number:

2,613

Number of followers:

172,307

NAICS:

5112

Industry Type:

Software Development

Homepage:

suse.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

SUS_3321211

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreSUSE Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suse.jpeg
SUSE Software Development
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreSUSE Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suse.jpeg
SUSE Software Development
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

SUSE Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
CarboniteBreach60406/2016
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Carbonite, a provider of online computer and server backup services suffered a password reuse attack in which some users’ credentials, obtained elsewhere, were used to obtain user data. The company notified its more than 1.5 million individual and small business customers and forced them to password reset. The attack was a result of a third-party attacker using compromised email addresses and passwords obtained from other companies that were previously attacked.

OpenText (Indian Enterprises - Survey Context)Ransomware100511/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Over half of Indian enterprises surveyed by OpenText faced **ransomware attacks** in the past year, with **71% reporting AI-driven phishing or deepfake attempts**, marking India as a highly targeted region. **70% of affected organizations paid ransoms** to regain data access—one of the highest global rates—yet only **12% fully recovered encrypted/stolen data**, exposing a critical gap between perceived resilience and actual recovery capabilities. Attacks increasingly exploited **third-party vendors or supply chains**, with **63% of organizations impacted by breaches via managed service providers**. Despite proactive measures like **cloud security (68%), network protection (60%), and backup technologies (58%)**, heavy reliance on external ecosystems amplified cascading risks. The financial and operational strain was compounded by **AI-enabled threats (deepfakes, voice/video spoofing)**, with **95% of firms allowing generative AI tools** but only **50% having formal AI governance policies**. Ransomware is now a **board-level priority (84% of execs rank it a top-3 risk)**, yet recovery tests (76% conduct multi-annual drills) and employee training (80% participation) have not prevented persistent data loss and operational disruption.

SUSEVulnerability10056/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: A critical security vulnerability in SUSE Manager allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. This flaw, tracked as CVE-2025-46811, has a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 and affects multiple versions of SUSE Manager across various platforms. The vulnerability stems from a Missing Authentication for Critical Function weakness, which targets a specific websocket endpoint. Organizations are at risk of widespread compromise, requiring immediate updates to mitigate the threat. The impact is significant as it could lead to complete system compromise, affecting enterprise infrastructure.

Carbonite
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 4
Seen: 06/2016
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Carbonite, a provider of online computer and server backup services suffered a password reuse attack in which some users’ credentials, obtained elsewhere, were used to obtain user data. The company notified its more than 1.5 million individual and small business customers and forced them to password reset. The attack was a result of a third-party attacker using compromised email addresses and passwords obtained from other companies that were previously attacked.

OpenText (Indian Enterprises - Survey Context)
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 11/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Over half of Indian enterprises surveyed by OpenText faced **ransomware attacks** in the past year, with **71% reporting AI-driven phishing or deepfake attempts**, marking India as a highly targeted region. **70% of affected organizations paid ransoms** to regain data access—one of the highest global rates—yet only **12% fully recovered encrypted/stolen data**, exposing a critical gap between perceived resilience and actual recovery capabilities. Attacks increasingly exploited **third-party vendors or supply chains**, with **63% of organizations impacted by breaches via managed service providers**. Despite proactive measures like **cloud security (68%), network protection (60%), and backup technologies (58%)**, heavy reliance on external ecosystems amplified cascading risks. The financial and operational strain was compounded by **AI-enabled threats (deepfakes, voice/video spoofing)**, with **95% of firms allowing generative AI tools** but only **50% having formal AI governance policies**. Ransomware is now a **board-level priority (84% of execs rank it a top-3 risk)**, yet recovery tests (76% conduct multi-annual drills) and employee training (80% participation) have not prevented persistent data loss and operational disruption.

SUSE
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: A critical security vulnerability in SUSE Manager allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. This flaw, tracked as CVE-2025-46811, has a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 and affects multiple versions of SUSE Manager across various platforms. The vulnerability stems from a Missing Authentication for Critical Function weakness, which targets a specific websocket endpoint. Organizations are at risk of widespread compromise, requiring immediate updates to mitigate the threat. The impact is significant as it could lead to complete system compromise, affecting enterprise infrastructure.

Ailogo

SUSE Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for SUSE

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

SUSE has 132.56% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

SUSE has 53.85% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types SUSE vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

SUSE reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 1 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History — SUSE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUSE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

SUSE Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

SUSE is a global leader in innovative, reliable and secure enterprise open source solutions, including SUSEⓇ Linux Suite, SUSEⓇ Rancher Suite, SUSEⓇ Edge Suite and SUSEⓇ AI Suite. More than 60% of the Fortune 500 rely on SUSE to power their mission-critical workloads, enabling them to innovate everywhere – from the data center to the cloud, to the edge and beyond. SUSE puts the “open” back in open source, collaborating with partners and communities to give customers the agility to tackle innovation challenges today and the freedom to evolve their strategy and solutions tomorrow. For more information, visit www.suse.com.

Loading...
similarCompanies

SUSE Similar Companies

Alibaba Group

🌍Alibaba Group is on a mission to make it easy to do business anywhere! Guided by our passion and imagination, we’re leading the way in AI, cloud computing and e-commerce. We aim to build the future infrastructure of commerce, and we aspire to be a good company that lasts for 102 years.

Red Hat

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, hybrid cloud, edge, and Kubernetes technologies. We hire creative, passionate people who are ready to contribute their ideas, help solve complex problems

IDEMIA

IDEMIA Group unlocks simpler and safer ways to pay, connect, access, identify, travel and protect public places. With its long-standing expertise in biometrics and cryptography, IDEMIA develops technologies of excellence with an impactful, ethical, and socially responsible approach. Every day, IDEMI

ByteDance is a global incubator of platforms at the cutting edge of commerce, content, entertainment and enterprise services - over 2.5bn people interact with ByteDance products including TikTok. Creation is the core of ByteDance's purpose. Our products are built to help imaginations thrive. This i

TOTVS

Olá, somos a TOTVS! A maior empresa de tecnologia do Brasil. 🤓 Líder absoluta em sistemas e plataformas para empresas, a TOTVS possui mais de 70 mil clientes. Indo muito além do ERP, oferece tecnologia completa para digitalização dos negócios por meio de 3 unidades de negócio: - Gestão: ERPs, sol

HubSpot

HubSpot is a leading CRM platform that provides software and support to help businesses grow better. Our platform includes marketing, sales, service, and website management products that start free and scale to meet our customers’ needs at any stage of growth. Today, thousands of customers around th

At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and we are looking for team membe

PedidosYa

We’re  the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is available for iOS, Android and

Rakuten

Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and communications to 2 billion m

newsone

SUSE CyberSecurity News

November 25, 2025 01:00 PM
SUSE’s MCP Server tech preview lays foundation for AI-assisted Linux infrastructure

Enterprise Linux company SUSE SE today announced a milestone in its mission to create an artificial intelligence-assisted computing...

November 24, 2025 09:19 AM
BD Soft Strengthens Cybersecurity for BFSI, Fintech with MDR & DLP Solutions

BD Soft enhances cybersecurity offerings for BFSI and Fintech sectors, addressing rising threats with advanced MDR and DLP solutions amid...

November 18, 2025 02:36 PM
Zig’s Bold Leap: SUSE’s Quest to Reinvent SSH for a Quantum Future

In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity and programming languages, a quiet revolution is brewing at SUSE. Engineer Lucas Mülling is...

October 30, 2025 07:00 AM
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16 puts AI in the operating system

SUSE has released SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) 16, calling it AI-ready and built for long-term use. The release marks the first major...

September 29, 2025 07:00 AM
SUSE Rancher Flaws Allow Attackers to Lock Admin Accounts

A critical security vulnerability has been discovered in SUSE Rancher Manager that allows attackers to effectively lock out administrative...

September 29, 2025 07:00 AM
SUSE Rancher Vulnerabilities Let Attackers Lockout the Administrators Account

A critical flaw in SUSE Rancher's user management module allows privileged users to disrupt administrative access by modifying usernames of...

September 29, 2025 07:00 AM
SUSE Rancher Flaws Allow Attackers to Lock Out Admin Accounts

A vulnerability in SUSE Rancher Manager has been discovered that enables attackers with elevated privileges to lock out administrative...

September 03, 2025 07:00 AM
SUSE teams up with Avesha to streamline AI deployment with optimized GPU-based infrastructure

Cloud computing orchestration startup Avesha Inc. has partnered with the Linux software giant SUSE SE on an enterprise-grade artificial...

August 01, 2025 07:18 PM
Cybercriminals planted Raspberry Pi in attempt to hack ATMs.

Russia targets embassies with ISP-level attacks. Critical flaw discovered in SUSE Manager.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

SUSE CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of SUSE

The official website of SUSE is http://www.suse.com.

SUSE’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, SUSE’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 765, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does SUSE’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, SUSE currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does SUSE have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, SUSE is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does SUSE have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, SUSE does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does SUSE comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, SUSE is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does SUSE have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, SUSE does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does SUSE comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, SUSE is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does SUSE have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,SUSE is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of SUSE

SUSE operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

Number of Employees at SUSE

SUSE employs approximately 2,613 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by SUSE

SUSE presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

SUSE’s LinkedIn Followers

SUSE’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 172,307 followers.

NAICS Classification of SUSE

SUSE is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

SUSE’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, SUSE does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

SUSE’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, SUSE maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/suse.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving SUSE

As of December 10, 2025, Rankiteo reports that SUSE has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

SUSE has an estimated 27,497 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at SUSE ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability, Breach and Ransomware.

How does SUSE detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with forced password reset, and communication strategy with customer notification, and containment measures with network segmentation, containment measures with access controls review, and remediation measures with immediate patching, remediation measures with version audits, and and and and third party assistance with managed service providers (83% of organizations), third party assistance with cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers (91%), and remediation measures with cloud security enhancements (68% priority), remediation measures with network protection (60% priority), remediation measures with backup technologies (58% priority), and recovery measures with ransomware recovery plan testing (76% test multiple times/year), recovery measures with security awareness training (80% conduct regularly)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack

Title: Password Reuse Attack on Carbonite

Description: Carbonite, a provider of online computer and server backup services, suffered a password reuse attack in which some users’ credentials, obtained elsewhere, were used to obtain user data. The company notified its more than 1.5 million individual and small business customers and forced them to password reset. The attack was a result of a third-party attacker using compromised email addresses and passwords obtained from other companies that were previously attacked.

Type: Password Reuse Attack

Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials

Vulnerability Exploited: Password Reuse

Threat Actor: Third-party attacker

Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: Critical Vulnerability in SUSE Manager (CVE-2025-46811)

Description: A newly disclosed critical security vulnerability in SUSE Manager poses severe risks to enterprise infrastructure, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: Network Accessible (AV:N), Low Attack Complexity (AC:L), No Required Privileges (PR:N)

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-46811

Incident : ransomware

Title: Ransomware and AI-Driven Cyber Threats Targeting Indian Enterprises (2023-2024)

Description: OpenText's fourth annual Global Ransomware Survey reveals that over 50% of Indian enterprises faced ransomware attacks in the past year, with 71% reporting a surge in AI-driven phishing or deepfake attempts. Nearly 70% of affected organizations paid ransoms, yet only 12% fully recovered encrypted or stolen data. The report highlights gaps in AI governance, third-party risks, and the escalating complexity of attacks, including supply chain breaches. Indian organizations are prioritizing cloud security, network protection, and backup technologies for 2026, with 84% of executive teams now treating ransomware as a top-three business risk.

Type: ransomware

Attack Vector: AI-driven phishingdeepfake (voice/video spoofing)third-party service providerssoftware supply chain

Vulnerability Exploited: insufficient AI governancethird-party ecosystem dependencieslack of formal AI-use/data privacy policies

Motivation: financial gain (ransom payments)data theftdisruption of operations

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Websocket endpoint: /rhn/websocket/minion/remote-commands and third-party service providerssoftware supply chainAI-driven phishing/deepfake attacks.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Data Compromised: User Data

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation SUS629073125

Systems Affected: Container suse/manager/5.0/x86_64/server:5.0.5.7.30.1SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS (all variants)SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-AzureSLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-EC2SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-GCESUSE Manager Server Module 4.3

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Downtime: True

Identity Theft Risk: True

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are User Credentials, Personally Identifiable Information (Likely), Corporate Data, Financial Data (Possible) and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Entity Name: Carbonite

Entity Type: Service Provider

Industry: Technology

Size: More than 1.5 million customers

Customers Affected: 1.5 million

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation SUS629073125

Entity Name: SUSE

Entity Type: Software Vendor

Industry: Technology

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Entity Name: Indian Enterprises (Survey Respondents)

Entity Type: private sector, public sector (if applicable)

Industry: technology, financial services, manufacturing, others (unspecified)

Location: India

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Containment Measures: Forced password reset

Communication Strategy: Customer notification

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation SUS629073125

Containment Measures: Network segmentationAccess controls review

Remediation Measures: Immediate patchingVersion audits

Network Segmentation: True

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Managed Service Providers (83% Of Organizations), Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers (91%).

Remediation Measures: cloud security enhancements (68% priority)network protection (60% priority)backup technologies (58% priority)

Recovery Measures: ransomware recovery plan testing (76% test multiple times/year)security awareness training (80% conduct regularly)

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through managed service providers (83% of organizations), cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers (91%), .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Type of Data Compromised: User Credentials

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (likely), Corporate data, Financial data (possible)

Sensitivity of Data: high (includes potential PII and corporate secrets)

Data Encryption: True

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Immediate patching, Version audits, , cloud security enhancements (68% priority), network protection (60% priority), backup technologies (58% priority), .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by forced password reset, network segmentation, access controls review and .

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Ransom Paid: 70% of affected organizations

Data Encryption: True

Data Exfiltration: True

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through ransomware recovery plan testing (76% test multiple times/year), security awareness training (80% conduct regularly), .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Lessons Learned: AI adoption outpaces governance: 95% allow generative AI tools, but only ~50% have formal AI-use/data privacy policies., Third-party risks are critical: 66% of organizations impacted by vendor/managed services breaches in the past year., Recovery confidence is misplaced: 98.6% express confidence in recovery, but only 12% fully recover data post-attack., Board-level engagement is rising: 84% of Indian executives now rank ransomware as a top-three business risk (vs. 71% globally)., Collaboration is key: Effectiveness depends on shared responsibility across organizations, partners, and technology providers.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation SUS629073125

Recommendations: Prioritize immediate patching, Monitor for suspicious activityPrioritize immediate patching, Monitor for suspicious activity

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Recommendations: Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are AI adoption outpaces governance: 95% allow generative AI tools, but only ~50% have formal AI-use/data privacy policies.,Third-party risks are critical: 66% of organizations impacted by vendor/managed services breaches in the past year.,Recovery confidence is misplaced: 98.6% express confidence in recovery, but only 12% fully recover data post-attack.,Board-level engagement is rising: 84% of Indian executives now rank ransomware as a top-three business risk (vs. 71% globally).,Collaboration is key: Effectiveness depends on shared responsibility across organizations, partners, and technology providers.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Source: OpenText Global Ransomware Survey (4th Annual)

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Source: ETCISO Article on OpenText Survey Findings

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: OpenText Global Ransomware Survey (4th Annual), and Source: ETCISO Article on OpenText Survey Findings.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Investigation Status: Survey-based findings (no specific incident investigation detailed)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Customer notification.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Stakeholder Advisories: Board-Level Engagement: 84% Of Indian Executives Treat Ransomware As A Top-Three Business Risk., Third-Party Advisories: 91% Conduct Formal Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers..

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Board-Level Engagement: 84% Of Indian Executives Treat Ransomware As A Top-Three Business Risk. and Third-Party Advisories: 91% Conduct Formal Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers..

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation SUS629073125

Entry Point: Websocket endpoint: /rhn/websocket/minion/remote-commands

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Entry Point: Third-Party Service Providers, Software Supply Chain, Ai-Driven Phishing/Deepfake Attacks,

High Value Targets: Corporate Data, Financial Systems, Customer Pii,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Corporate Data, Financial Systems, Customer Pii,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Root Causes: Password Reuse

Corrective Actions: Forced password reset

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation SUS629073125

Root Causes: Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306)

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Root Causes: Rapid Ai Adoption Without Commensurate Governance (E.G., Lack Of Formal Ai-Use Policies)., Over-Reliance On Third-Party Ecosystems With Inadequate Security Oversight., Insufficient Testing Of Ransomware Recovery Plans (Gap Between Confidence And Actual Recovery Rates)., Expanding Attack Surface Due To Hybrid/Ai-Powered Environments.,

Corrective Actions: Accelerate Implementation Of Ai Governance Frameworks And Data Privacy Policies., Enhance Third-Party Risk Management Programs, Including Continuous Monitoring Of Suppliers., Increase Frequency And Rigor Of Ransomware Recovery Simulations., Invest In Advanced Threat Detection For Ai-Driven Attacks (E.G., Deepfake Identification Tools)., Promote Cross-Industry Collaboration To Address Systemic Vulnerabilities In Supply Chains.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Managed Service Providers (83% Of Organizations), Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers (91%), .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Forced password reset, Accelerate Implementation Of Ai Governance Frameworks And Data Privacy Policies., Enhance Third-Party Risk Management Programs, Including Continuous Monitoring Of Suppliers., Increase Frequency And Rigor Of Ransomware Recovery Simulations., Invest In Advanced Threat Detection For Ai-Driven Attacks (E.G., Deepfake Identification Tools)., Promote Cross-Industry Collaboration To Address Systemic Vulnerabilities In Supply Chains., .

Additional Questions

General Information

Has the company ever paid ransoms ?

Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Third-party attacker.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were User Data and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Container suse/manager/5.0/x86_64/server:5.0.5.7.30.1SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS (all variants)SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-AzureSLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-EC2SLES15-SP4-Manager-Server-4-3-BYOS-GCESUSE Manager Server Module 4.3 and .

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was managed service providers (83% of organizations), cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers (91%), .

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Forced password reset and Network segmentationAccess controls review.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was User Data.

Ransomware Information

What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was 70% of affected organizations.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Collaboration is key: Effectiveness depends on shared responsibility across organizations, partners, and technology providers.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Monitor for suspicious activity, Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience. and Prioritize immediate patching.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are OpenText Global Ransomware Survey (4th Annual) and ETCISO Article on OpenText Survey Findings.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Survey-based findings (no specific incident investigation detailed).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Board-level engagement: 84% of Indian executives treat ransomware as a top-three business risk., Third-party advisories: 91% conduct formal cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers., .

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Websocket endpoint: /rhn/websocket/minion/remote-commands.

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Password Reuse, Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306), Rapid AI adoption without commensurate governance (e.g., lack of formal AI-use policies).Over-reliance on third-party ecosystems with inadequate security oversight.Insufficient testing of ransomware recovery plans (gap between confidence and actual recovery rates).Expanding attack surface due to hybrid/AI-powered environments..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Forced password reset, Accelerate implementation of AI governance frameworks and data privacy policies.Enhance third-party risk management programs, including continuous monitoring of suppliers.Increase frequency and rigor of ransomware recovery simulations.Invest in advanced threat detection for AI-driven attacks (e.g., deepfake identification tools).Promote cross-industry collaboration to address systemic vulnerabilities in supply chains..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=suse' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge