Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Survival Flight Inc. » SUR1773174632

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SUR1773174632)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-68
Company Score Before Incident757 / 1000
Company Score After Incident689 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSUR1773174632
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive patient information including names,...
INCIDENT DATE16/07/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Survival Flight Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Survival Flight Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Survival Flight Inc. breach identified under incident ID SUR1773174632.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Survival Flight Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/survival-flight-inc., the number of followers: 511, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 152 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 757 and after the incident was 689 with a difference of -68 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Survival Flight Inc. and their customers.

On 17 July 2025, Survival Flight, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Survival Flight Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information".

Survival Flight, Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive patient information including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, health insurance details, medical records, and patient account numbers.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Engaged third-party cybersecurity experts.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its IT systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating detecting unauthorized access to its IT systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, financial account numbers compromised and Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to sensitive patient information including health insurance details. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing sensitive data...exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating medical records and treatment information exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration...posted the stolen data on the dark web and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating hacking group Worldleaks claimed responsibility, posting data on dark web. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk and potential legal liabilities. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access detected after the fact and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on initial access vector or vulnerability exploited. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (70%)
Hide Artifacts (50%)

Sources & References