Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Surplus Line Association of CaliforniaThe Surplus Line Association of California
VS
AflacAflac
The Surplus Line Association of California

The Surplus Line Association of California

12667 Alcosta Boulevard, San Ramon, 94583, US

Last Update: 14/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.slacal.com
687/1000Weak

The Surplus Line Association of California serves as the statutory surplus line advisory organization to the California Department of Insurance (CDI) and facilitates the state’s capacity to monitor and direct surplus line brokers’ placements of insurance with eligible s...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:177
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Aflac

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.aflac.com
424/1000Critical

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,986
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Surplus Line Association of California

The Surplus Line Association of California

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aflac

Aflac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

The Surplus Line Association of California has 31.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Aflac has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - The Surplus Line Association of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Surplus Line Association of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Surplus Line Association of California

The Surplus Line Association of California

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUR1784053658
Aflac

Aflac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1782816142
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AFLJAGNUC1768389868
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1768391547

FAQ

Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California company and Aflac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Surplus Line Association of California or Aflac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Surplus Line Association of California or Aflac ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California and Aflac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Surplus Line Association of California and Aflac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA