Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Rehab Resources » SUPSUPPAT1773081665

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SUPSUPPAT1773081665)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-52
Company Score Before Incident811 / 1000
Company Score After Incident759 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSUPSUPPAT1773081665
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORPhishing
DATA EXPOSEDProtected health information (PHI) and...
INCIDENT DATE16/11/2025
STATUSCompleted (forensic review concluded on January 9, 2026)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Rehab Resources's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Rehab Resources Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Rehab Resources breach identified under incident ID SUPSUPPAT1773081665.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Rehab Resources's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/superior-care-plus, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 11 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 811 and after the incident was 759 with a difference of -52 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Rehab Resources and their customers.

On 16 January 2026, Superior Care Plus, LLC (Supportive Home Health Care and Patriot Outpatient, LLC) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Northeast Ohio Healthcare Provider Reports Phishing-Led Data Breach".

Superior Care Plus, LLC (operating as Supportive Home Health Care and Patriot Outpatient, LLC) disclosed a data breach exposing the protected health information (PHI) and personally identifiable information (PII) of 1,415 patients.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Employee email account, and exposing Protected health information (PHI) and personally identifiable information (PII), with nearly 1415 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Password changes, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notice published on website, affected individuals notified via mail, dedicated helpline established.

The case underscores how Completed (forensic review concluded on January 9, 2026), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Dedicated helpline (1-888-572-7322) established for inquiries.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including incident stemmed from a phishing attack, and phishing attack that compromised a single employee’s email account and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating phishing attack that compromised a single employee’s email account. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution (T1204) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised a single employee’s email account (user interaction) and User Execution: Malicious Link (T1204.001) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating phishing attack that compromised a single employee’s email account. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating password changes implemented post-incident and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party accessed emails and files within the account. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection (T1114) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party accessed emails and files within the account and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included names, email addresses, SSNs, Medicare numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposing PHI/PII of 1,415 patients and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party accessed emails and files (likely exfiltrated). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but included due to breach impact and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating pHI/PII exposed; potential for misuse. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (95%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Execution
User Execution (80%)
User Execution: Malicious Link (75%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (30%)
Credentials from Password Stores (40%)
Collection
Email Collection (90%)
Data from Local System (85%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (20%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References