Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » SUNY Niagara » SUN1765305594

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SUN1765305594)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-96
Company Score Before Incident770 / 1000
Company Score After Incident674 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSUN1765305594
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of students
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of SUNY Niagara's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts SUNY Niagara Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the SUNY Niagara breach identified under incident ID SUN1765305594.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of SUNY Niagara's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sunyniagara, the number of followers: 14350, the industry type: Higher Education and the number of employees: 135 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 770 and after the incident was 674 with a difference of -96 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on SUNY Niagara and their customers.

State University of New York at Niagara (SUNY Niagara) recently reported "SUNY Niagara Data Breach Class Action", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

State University of New York at Niagara faces a proposed class action alleging it negligently failed to protect the personal information of more than 10,000 students that was exposed in a 2024 data breach.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal information of students, with nearly 10,000+ records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating failed to implement adequate data security measures and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exposed the personal information of over 10,000 students. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including personal information of students, and 10,000+ records exposed and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach that exposed the personal information. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating failed to protect sensitive information. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating failed to implement adequate data security measures. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References