Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Summit » SUM2120021112625

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SUM2120021112625)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-62
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident690 / 1000
Company LinkView Summit Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSUM2120021112625
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDName, Social Security number, Contact...
INCIDENT DATE04/10/2025
STATUSOngoing (review of impacted data and identification of affected individuals in progress as of November 2025)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Summit's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Summit Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Summit breach identified under incident ID SUM2120021112625.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Summit's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/summitsays, the number of followers: 5005, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 175 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 690 with a difference of -62 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Summit and their customers.

On 05 October 2025, Summit disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Summit Data Breach - October 2025".

Summit reported a data breach to the Attorney General of New Hampshire, where an unauthorized party gained access to corporate systems, potentially compromising sensitive personal identifiable information (PII).

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Certain corporate systems, and exposing Name, Social Security number and Contact information.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, while recovery efforts such as 24 months of complimentary credit monitoring for affected individuals continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Data breach notification letters mailed to impacted individuals starting November 21, 2025.

The case underscores how Ongoing (review of impacted data and identification of affected individuals in progress as of November 2025), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Data breach notification letters with details on impacted PII and credit monitoring offer.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party gained access to its corporate systems (no explicit vector, but implies credential misuse). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive PII (names, SSNs, contact details) was accessed and potentially acquired. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access and acquisition confirmed (no protocol specified, but data exfiltration implied). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1598) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromise of customer data (PII) with high risk of identity theft. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References